They were highly effective at destroying enemy Tigers. The Soviets also developed the 85 mm anti-tank gun, which was mounted on the ferociously mass-produced T-34s to form the T-34-85. Later came the SU-85, which could effectively knock out Tigers from a greater distance.And only hurting his Barrel surprisingly these tiger ones seem to be able to take quite a beating from the Abrams. Now I will say. This part was hilarious. We're all in Discord.To counter the new threat, the Sherman was equipped with thicker frontal armor and a new gun. In 1944, the U.S. fielded the 76mm M1 high-velocity long-barrel gun which could actually penetrate a Tiger's armor from the front. The gun had already seen action with U.S. Tank Destroyer Battalions.
What WWII tank can destroy a tiger tank : Its 76 mm, M1 was considered to be a fine gun and by late 1944, the army was producing effective rounds for it. Tiger I had armor up to 120 mm thick. Tiger II had up 185 mm thick. The Hellcat tank commander can destroy either, depending on shot placement and range.
Could a Churchill tank destroy a Tiger
In one encounter, on 21 April 1943, during the start of the Battle of Longstop Hill, a Churchill tank of the 48th Royal Tank Regiment got the better of a German Tiger I heavy tank. A 6 pounder shot from the Churchill lodged between the Tiger's turret and turret ring, jamming the turret and injuring the German crew.
What tanks could penetrate a Tiger : The IS-2's 122 mm gun could penetrate the Tiger's front armour from between 1,500 and 2,500 m (0.93 and 1.55 mi), depending on the impact angle. However, according to Steven Zaloga, the IS-2 and Tiger I could each knock the other out in normal combat distances below 1,000 m.
A T-34 facing up against a Heavy Tank the Tiger II the tiger wins automatically there is no possible way a T34 can penetrate it's 184mm turret armor and a sloped frontal armor of the heavy. The Soviet T34 didn't do so well against less powerful Tiger I and Panther tanks. The most important strike, which is clearly visible today, saw a 6-pounder round scrape the underside of the Tiger's 88mm gun, before hitting the gun mantlet and lodging itself in the turret ring. This jammed the turret and effectively prevented the Tiger from fighting.
Could a bazooka take out a tiger tank
During the Allied invasion of Sicily, small numbers of the M1A1 bazooka (using an improved rocket, the M6A1) were used in combat by U.S. forces. The M1A1 accounted for four medium German tanks and a heavy Tiger I, with the latter being knocked out by an improbable hit through the driver's vision slot.The 85 mm gun could penetrate the turret front of a Tiger I tank from 500 m (550 yd) and the driver's front plate from 300 m (330 yd) at the side angle of 30 degrees, and the larger turret enabled the addition of another crew member, allowing the roles of commander and gunner to be separated and increasing the rate of …Churchill tanks
One Tiger was hit by three shots from the 6-pounder guns (57mm) of the Churchill tanks of A Squadron, 4 Troop of the 48th Royal Tank Regiment (48 RTR). In one encounter, on 21 April 1943, during the start of the Battle of Longstop Hill, a Churchill tank of the 48th Royal Tank Regiment got the better of a German Tiger I heavy tank. A 6 pounder shot from the Churchill lodged between the Tiger's turret and turret ring, jamming the turret and injuring the German crew.
Is t34 better than Tiger : In some ways the t-34 does infact have better armour than the tiger 1 at by it beeing sloped wich causes some shells to ricochet at high angles. The germans later adopted this sloped armour technology for their later tanks like the panther and tiger 2.
Could a panzerfaust destroy a Tiger : Sure. A Panzerfaust 60 can penetrate around 200mm of RHA at 60m, and the Tiger II's armor is 185mm at the front, but well sloped, meaning the effective armor of the frontal plate is way over 200mm.
Can T-34 defeat Tiger
It depends on the model of the T-34 and the ammunition used. The rear armour of the Tiger I was the same as the side armour. Don't belioeve Kelly's Heroes! With most normal issue APC ammunition the F-34 76 mm armed T-34 could not defeat the Tiger beyond 100 m. With the addition of the 76mm M1A2 gun, the Easy Eight could penetrate the frontal armor of Heavily armoured german tanks like the Panther and the Tiger. The Easy Eight was so effective that it was still effective well into the Korean War.As the war progressed the Germans created heavier tank designs like the Tiger I or Panther which were both immune to the 76mm gun of the T-34 when fired upon from the front. This meant that they could only be penetrated from the sides at ranges of a few hundred metres.
Was the Tiger 1 a bad tank : 1,347 were built between August 1942 and August 1944. After August 1944, production of the Tiger I was phased out in favour of the Tiger II. While the Tiger I has been called an outstanding design for its time, it has also been called overengineered, using expensive materials and labour-intensive production methods.
![Kladsko-5-malý-Karlův-Most[1]](https://www.einarstrayorchestra.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Kladsko-5-maly-Karluv-Most1-1024x692-250x120.jpg)
![Stubai[1]](https://www.einarstrayorchestra.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Stubai1-250x120.jpg)
Antwort Which tank could destroy a tiger? Weitere Antworten – What tanks could beat the Tiger
Out-Gun and Out-Perform
They were highly effective at destroying enemy Tigers. The Soviets also developed the 85 mm anti-tank gun, which was mounted on the ferociously mass-produced T-34s to form the T-34-85. Later came the SU-85, which could effectively knock out Tigers from a greater distance.And only hurting his Barrel surprisingly these tiger ones seem to be able to take quite a beating from the Abrams. Now I will say. This part was hilarious. We're all in Discord.To counter the new threat, the Sherman was equipped with thicker frontal armor and a new gun. In 1944, the U.S. fielded the 76mm M1 high-velocity long-barrel gun which could actually penetrate a Tiger's armor from the front. The gun had already seen action with U.S. Tank Destroyer Battalions.
What WWII tank can destroy a tiger tank : Its 76 mm, M1 was considered to be a fine gun and by late 1944, the army was producing effective rounds for it. Tiger I had armor up to 120 mm thick. Tiger II had up 185 mm thick. The Hellcat tank commander can destroy either, depending on shot placement and range.
Could a Churchill tank destroy a Tiger
In one encounter, on 21 April 1943, during the start of the Battle of Longstop Hill, a Churchill tank of the 48th Royal Tank Regiment got the better of a German Tiger I heavy tank. A 6 pounder shot from the Churchill lodged between the Tiger's turret and turret ring, jamming the turret and injuring the German crew.
What tanks could penetrate a Tiger : The IS-2's 122 mm gun could penetrate the Tiger's front armour from between 1,500 and 2,500 m (0.93 and 1.55 mi), depending on the impact angle. However, according to Steven Zaloga, the IS-2 and Tiger I could each knock the other out in normal combat distances below 1,000 m.
A T-34 facing up against a Heavy Tank the Tiger II the tiger wins automatically there is no possible way a T34 can penetrate it's 184mm turret armor and a sloped frontal armor of the heavy. The Soviet T34 didn't do so well against less powerful Tiger I and Panther tanks.
The most important strike, which is clearly visible today, saw a 6-pounder round scrape the underside of the Tiger's 88mm gun, before hitting the gun mantlet and lodging itself in the turret ring. This jammed the turret and effectively prevented the Tiger from fighting.
Could a bazooka take out a tiger tank
During the Allied invasion of Sicily, small numbers of the M1A1 bazooka (using an improved rocket, the M6A1) were used in combat by U.S. forces. The M1A1 accounted for four medium German tanks and a heavy Tiger I, with the latter being knocked out by an improbable hit through the driver's vision slot.The 85 mm gun could penetrate the turret front of a Tiger I tank from 500 m (550 yd) and the driver's front plate from 300 m (330 yd) at the side angle of 30 degrees, and the larger turret enabled the addition of another crew member, allowing the roles of commander and gunner to be separated and increasing the rate of …Churchill tanks
One Tiger was hit by three shots from the 6-pounder guns (57mm) of the Churchill tanks of A Squadron, 4 Troop of the 48th Royal Tank Regiment (48 RTR).
In one encounter, on 21 April 1943, during the start of the Battle of Longstop Hill, a Churchill tank of the 48th Royal Tank Regiment got the better of a German Tiger I heavy tank. A 6 pounder shot from the Churchill lodged between the Tiger's turret and turret ring, jamming the turret and injuring the German crew.
Is t34 better than Tiger : In some ways the t-34 does infact have better armour than the tiger 1 at by it beeing sloped wich causes some shells to ricochet at high angles. The germans later adopted this sloped armour technology for their later tanks like the panther and tiger 2.
Could a panzerfaust destroy a Tiger : Sure. A Panzerfaust 60 can penetrate around 200mm of RHA at 60m, and the Tiger II's armor is 185mm at the front, but well sloped, meaning the effective armor of the frontal plate is way over 200mm.
Can T-34 defeat Tiger
It depends on the model of the T-34 and the ammunition used. The rear armour of the Tiger I was the same as the side armour. Don't belioeve Kelly's Heroes! With most normal issue APC ammunition the F-34 76 mm armed T-34 could not defeat the Tiger beyond 100 m.
With the addition of the 76mm M1A2 gun, the Easy Eight could penetrate the frontal armor of Heavily armoured german tanks like the Panther and the Tiger. The Easy Eight was so effective that it was still effective well into the Korean War.As the war progressed the Germans created heavier tank designs like the Tiger I or Panther which were both immune to the 76mm gun of the T-34 when fired upon from the front. This meant that they could only be penetrated from the sides at ranges of a few hundred metres.
Was the Tiger 1 a bad tank : 1,347 were built between August 1942 and August 1944. After August 1944, production of the Tiger I was phased out in favour of the Tiger II. While the Tiger I has been called an outstanding design for its time, it has also been called overengineered, using expensive materials and labour-intensive production methods.