Gameplay wise, I'd definitely play RDR1 first. Things like the hunting and overall feel of the game is more refined, even the little things like interacting with NPC's (RDR1; simple comment depending on honor but using CIRCLE/B, RDR2; full interaction, Defuse, Call Out, etc).It is recommended that you play it after completing Red Dead Redemption to understand many of the references to the base game and to better appreciate its macabre sense of humor. Red Dead Redemption 2 is a prequel to Red Dead Redemption.Narrative Depth: The storytelling in Red Dead Redemption is highly regarded for its layers and maturity. Experiencing the first game before the second will allow you to appreciate the evolution of the narrative and writing in the series [1].
Does red dead 1 or 2 take place first : The game doesn't outright state what year everything happens, but it seems to be set in the 1880s, meaning the events of the game occur before Red Dead Redemption 2. The first Redemption game takes place after RDR2 and is mostly set in 1911, with the post-credits content taking place in 1914.
Are RDR 1 and 2 connected
Although it's the second game in the series, RDR2 is actually a prequel to Red Dead Redemption, featuring a younger version of John Marston. After getting him safely back to camp and chastising him for his irresponsibility, the story's attention shifts to the O'Driscolls, whose own camp is nearby.
Is Red Dead Redemption 1 or 2 better : RDR or RDR 2 Upon replaying RDR on the switch now and revisiting old memories i have to say RDR1 is a significantly better game than RDR2. The missions are varied, fun and not very drawn out with long horserides and constant chatter.
Red Dead Redemption length
As mentioned, the number of hours it takes to complete the original Red Dead Redemption depends on how you spend your time playing, so here are some rough time indicators: Story-focused: 20-25 hours. Story + side activities: 25-35 hours. Slow and thorough/100% completionist: 35+ hours. As many know, Arthur Morgan dies at the end of RDR2 and that "explains" why he's not in RDR1. However, that's only justification; the real reason Arthur Morgan is never even mentioned in RDR1 is because, at the time, he did not exist.
Is Red Dead 1 as good as RDR2
RDR or RDR 2 Upon replaying RDR on the switch now and revisiting old memories i have to say RDR1 is a significantly better game than RDR2. The missions are varied, fun and not very drawn out with long horserides and constant chatter.Given that Grand Theft Auto 6's release seems to be Rockstar's main focus at this time, it's unlikely RDR3 will be coming out any time soon. Even though it may already be in development, the eight-year gap between Red Dead Redemption and RDR2 also suggests these games take time.not required. infact you may prefer playing rdr2 before playing red dead redemption. in terms of the games release red dead redemption came out first and red dead redemption 2 obviously came out second. chronologically in terms of the events ,the setting of the game. So that sucked and if you're interested in the online. Then yeah the only two versions you can play is PS3. And 360. And honestly for me I loved the single player for Red Dead Redemption 1.
Is RDR1 bigger than RDR2 : Thanks to a large portion of RDR1's map appearing in the sequel, RDR2's map is more than double the size of its predecessor's. Almost the entirety of RDR2's story takes place east of the areas explored by John Marston in RDR1.
Is Arthur in RDR3 : He also mentioned that the character Arthur Morgan will not be featured in the game if it is released. While this may seem obvious to those who played Red Dead Redemption 2, there is still a possibility that Rockstar may explore another prequel in the future. "I'm certain we will see RDR3 one day.
Is Arthur Morgan in RDR1
As many know, Arthur Morgan dies at the end of RDR2 and that "explains" why he's not in RDR1. However, that's only justification; the real reason Arthur Morgan is never even mentioned in RDR1 is because, at the time, he did not exist. If Rockstar maintains a similar development cycle, a potential Red Dead Redemption 3 release might unfold between 2026 and 2030—eight years after RDR 2 and five years after GTA 6.The Possible Timeframes of Red Dead Redemption 3
A 1914-set Red Dead 3 could follow Jack Marston with players already taking control of him in the epilogue of 2010's RDR. The start of this setting could still focus on the final days of the Wild West, with Jack eventually fighting in World War 1 around 1917.
Will we see RDR3 : If Rockstar maintains a similar development cycle, a potential Red Dead Redemption 3 release might unfold between 2026 and 2030—eight years after RDR 2 and five years after GTA 6.
![Kladsko-5-malý-Karlův-Most[1]](https://www.einarstrayorchestra.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Kladsko-5-maly-Karluv-Most1-1024x692-250x120.jpg)
![Stubai[1]](https://www.einarstrayorchestra.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Stubai1-250x120.jpg)
Antwort Which Red Dead should I play first? Weitere Antworten – Which red dead game do you play first
Gameplay wise, I'd definitely play RDR1 first. Things like the hunting and overall feel of the game is more refined, even the little things like interacting with NPC's (RDR1; simple comment depending on honor but using CIRCLE/B, RDR2; full interaction, Defuse, Call Out, etc).It is recommended that you play it after completing Red Dead Redemption to understand many of the references to the base game and to better appreciate its macabre sense of humor. Red Dead Redemption 2 is a prequel to Red Dead Redemption.Narrative Depth: The storytelling in Red Dead Redemption is highly regarded for its layers and maturity. Experiencing the first game before the second will allow you to appreciate the evolution of the narrative and writing in the series [1].
Does red dead 1 or 2 take place first : The game doesn't outright state what year everything happens, but it seems to be set in the 1880s, meaning the events of the game occur before Red Dead Redemption 2. The first Redemption game takes place after RDR2 and is mostly set in 1911, with the post-credits content taking place in 1914.
Are RDR 1 and 2 connected
Although it's the second game in the series, RDR2 is actually a prequel to Red Dead Redemption, featuring a younger version of John Marston. After getting him safely back to camp and chastising him for his irresponsibility, the story's attention shifts to the O'Driscolls, whose own camp is nearby.
Is Red Dead Redemption 1 or 2 better : RDR or RDR 2 Upon replaying RDR on the switch now and revisiting old memories i have to say RDR1 is a significantly better game than RDR2. The missions are varied, fun and not very drawn out with long horserides and constant chatter.
Red Dead Redemption length
As mentioned, the number of hours it takes to complete the original Red Dead Redemption depends on how you spend your time playing, so here are some rough time indicators: Story-focused: 20-25 hours. Story + side activities: 25-35 hours. Slow and thorough/100% completionist: 35+ hours.
As many know, Arthur Morgan dies at the end of RDR2 and that "explains" why he's not in RDR1. However, that's only justification; the real reason Arthur Morgan is never even mentioned in RDR1 is because, at the time, he did not exist.
Is Red Dead 1 as good as RDR2
RDR or RDR 2 Upon replaying RDR on the switch now and revisiting old memories i have to say RDR1 is a significantly better game than RDR2. The missions are varied, fun and not very drawn out with long horserides and constant chatter.Given that Grand Theft Auto 6's release seems to be Rockstar's main focus at this time, it's unlikely RDR3 will be coming out any time soon. Even though it may already be in development, the eight-year gap between Red Dead Redemption and RDR2 also suggests these games take time.not required. infact you may prefer playing rdr2 before playing red dead redemption. in terms of the games release red dead redemption came out first and red dead redemption 2 obviously came out second. chronologically in terms of the events ,the setting of the game.
So that sucked and if you're interested in the online. Then yeah the only two versions you can play is PS3. And 360. And honestly for me I loved the single player for Red Dead Redemption 1.
Is RDR1 bigger than RDR2 : Thanks to a large portion of RDR1's map appearing in the sequel, RDR2's map is more than double the size of its predecessor's. Almost the entirety of RDR2's story takes place east of the areas explored by John Marston in RDR1.
Is Arthur in RDR3 : He also mentioned that the character Arthur Morgan will not be featured in the game if it is released. While this may seem obvious to those who played Red Dead Redemption 2, there is still a possibility that Rockstar may explore another prequel in the future. "I'm certain we will see RDR3 one day.
Is Arthur Morgan in RDR1
As many know, Arthur Morgan dies at the end of RDR2 and that "explains" why he's not in RDR1. However, that's only justification; the real reason Arthur Morgan is never even mentioned in RDR1 is because, at the time, he did not exist.
If Rockstar maintains a similar development cycle, a potential Red Dead Redemption 3 release might unfold between 2026 and 2030—eight years after RDR 2 and five years after GTA 6.The Possible Timeframes of Red Dead Redemption 3
A 1914-set Red Dead 3 could follow Jack Marston with players already taking control of him in the epilogue of 2010's RDR. The start of this setting could still focus on the final days of the Wild West, with Jack eventually fighting in World War 1 around 1917.
Will we see RDR3 : If Rockstar maintains a similar development cycle, a potential Red Dead Redemption 3 release might unfold between 2026 and 2030—eight years after RDR 2 and five years after GTA 6.