Antwort Was World War 1 or 2 worse for soldiers? Weitere Antworten – Was WW1 or WW2 worse for soldiers

Was World War 1 or 2 worse for soldiers?
How Did World War I and World War II Vary In Terms of the Number of Casualties WWII was more deadly and widespread than WWI, which had around 8.5 million military fatalities, with over 16 million military fatalities and an estimated 70-85 million overall casualties, including civilians.World War II was the deadliest conflict in human history marked by 50 to 85 million fatalities, most of whom were civilians in the Soviet Union and China.However, was it worse for the individual soldier than its predecessor Think about the trenches of the Great War and the mental effect it had on soldiers. I personally would say that for the individual World War 1 was worse, but statistically of course it would seem like World War 2 was far worse.

How was fighting in WWII different from WW1 : Military equipment became bigger, faster, more reliable, and more sophisticated. World War II saw more air and sea battles than World War I as the majority of World War I had been fought on land. Advances had been made in medicine between the two wars so that fewer people died from infected wounds and disease.

Was ww1 more traumatic than ww2

But though six times as many American men were screened and rejected for service in the lead-up to the World War II, military service still took its toll. About twice as many American soldiers showed symptoms of PTSD during World War II than in World War I.

What made ww1 so brutal : Losses on all fronts for the year 1914 topped five million, with a million men killed. This was a scale of violence unknown in any previous war. The cause was to be found in the lethal combination of mass armies and modern weaponry. Chief among that latter was quick-firing artillery.

Also called The Great War, World War I was one of the deadliest conflicts in history, and set the stage for another world war just 20 years later. It was known as “The Great War”—a land, air and sea conflict so terrible, it left over 8 million military personnel and 6.6 million civilians dead.

Wars and armed conflicts

Event Lowest estimate Highest estimate
World War II 35,000,000 118,357,000
Mongol invasions and conquests 30,000,000 57,000,000
Taiping Rebellion 20,000,000 30,000,000
European colonization of the Americas 8,400,000 80,000,000

Was WW1 or 2 more brutal

3 The brutality of WWII saw 42 countries contribute to the killing of 60 million people, costing the world economy approximately $1.3 trillion. 4 From a pure statistical perspective, WWII demonstrated a higher level of intensity than WWI as a result of military actions and its consequences.But though six times as many American men were screened and rejected for service in the lead-up to the World War II, military service still took its toll. About twice as many American soldiers showed symptoms of PTSD during World War II than in World War I.Yes, absolutely many lads joined up in WW1 underage as young as 16 years old. They would be under 40 at the outbreak of the second. Many of the officers and commanders on both sides served in both wars: Field Marshal Montgomery, General Patton and Field Marshal Rommel, to name a few.

GENERAL THEODORE ROOSEVELT JR. Theodore Roosevelt Jr., the eldest son of American President Theodore Roosevelt, fought in both world wars. In 1919, after fathering the creation of The American Legion, Roosevelt fought off all efforts to be elected national commander.

What war gave the most PTSD : U.S. Veterans of Different Service Eras

Service Era PTSD in the Past Year PTSD at Some Point in Life
Persian Gulf War (Desert Storm) 14 out of 100 (14%) 21 out of 100 (21%)
Vietnam War 5 out of 100 (5%) 10 out of 100 (10%)
World War II (WWII) and Korean War 2 out of 100 (2%) 3 out of 100 (3%)

Did WW1 soldiers have PTSD : Hundreds of thousands of men on both sides left World War I with what would now be called PTSD, and while some received a rudimentary form of psychiatric treatment, they were vilified after the war.

Why was WW1 so bad for soldiers

In battle, soldiers had to charge out of the trenches and across no-man's land into a hail of bullets and shrapnel and poison gas. They were easy targets and casualties were enormously high. By the end of 1914, after just five months of fighting, the number of dead and wounded exceeded four million men.

World War I has been called unnecessary because the original dispute that triggered the conflict was limited, yet it triggered a massive, global war.The Civil War was the deadliest war in American history. Altogether, over 600,000 died in the conflict, more than World War I and World War II combined. A soldier was 13 times more likely to die in the Civil War than in the Vietnam War.

Why was World War 1 so cruel : New technologies like chemical gas and long-range artillery drove conflict to cruel new heights. Nine million soldiers died while the civilian death toll likely exceeded ten million. Infectious diseases also ran rampant, fighting leveled infrastructure, and the financial toll of the war was immense.