Upon release, the game received generally positive reviews from critics, who praised its gameplay and new multiplayer modes but criticized for its shortage of content at launch and lack of innovation. It sold 7.3 million units by the end of 2018, but was a commercial disappointment for Electronic Arts.DICE and EA insulted the fanbase before it came out, and then abandoned the game less than 2 years after launch. Hopefully DICE can learn. With the addition of Battlefield Hardline in recent years, why does it seem that it hasn't gotten backlash from gamers, unlike Battlefield VAnd game overall. Then Battlefield 5 can feel a bit like a fresh Breeze. At least it did that for me. I usually play as a sniper in most FPS games and Battlefield 5 is no exception.
Do people still play BF5 : Period is huge for Battlefield 5 just under 60,000 players in 2024 and 2042 not even 20,000 so it's a third of Battlefield 5 it's insane how Battlefield 5 just remains popular after all these years so
What went wrong with BF5
Visibility: Visibility was simply horrible in BF5 and unfortunately some of these issues have persisted into 2042. Ping System: This was a bad Battle Royale import like many of the objectionable features, the 3D spotting system was much better for visibility and situation awareness.
Is Battlefield 5 or 2042 better : Both 2042 and BF5 had rough launches. The difference is, BF5 actually had the potential of being a good Battlefield game. 2042 is VERY far from that potential. Players are going back to BF5 now, because they miss their Battlefield dose- since 2042 does not give you that.
"[The V sign] represents 'V for Victory,'" the Battlefield Twitter account said. "The phrase and sign were popularised by Winston Churchill and used amongst the allies for much of WWII. It's also why we chose to use the Roman numeral V instead of the number 5 for the title." There are also some gory moments, including gored men being shoveled into the snow(not clearly seen) and stacks of people with blood all over the place. (implying that they were executed). In the multiplayer, it is different. When you shoot someone, there are graphic blood spurts.
What made Battlefield 5 bad
The game is low on content with very little maps, the game throws away historical accuracy even though it was marketed as a realistic ww2 game. The devs promised consistent updates with new content and almost a year has went by with barely any new content brought into the game.6 Battlefield 1 Offers More Steady Gameplay & Better Weaponry. However, speaking about gameplay, Battlefield 1 should come home with the winning belt for this. Even though they're not as overpowered as Battlefield 5, the weaponry in this game did an excellent job highlighting the key technology of the era.Yes it is. There are more than 60 servers. There are like 300, and many players are playing it. Both 2042 and BF5 had rough launches. The difference is, BF5 actually had the potential of being a good Battlefield game. 2042 is VERY far from that potential. Players are going back to BF5 now, because they miss their Battlefield dose- since 2042 does not give you that.
Why is Battlefield 5 controversial : Battlefield V's decision to prominently feature women in combat as part of its World War II setting may have angered some gamers online — who responded to the inclusion of female soldiers with the #NotMyBattlefield hashtag — but developers at Electronic Arts and DICE remain unmoved by the reaction.
Is Battlefield better than CoD : CoD or Battlefield – which is better Considering all the differences, gameplay details, and realistic graphics quality, we must admit that Battlefield is better. It's a solid title delivering high-quality graphics, giant maps, thrilling multiplayer, and accurate weapons.
Does battlefield 1 swear
Occasional profanity, including "f–k," "s–t." Outside of this, risk of other offensive language possible in team chats during multiplayer. like the other battlefields have. Recommend for 13 year-old and maybe even mature 12 year-old. The game is not very gory the only time you really see blood is if you knife someone a little squirt of blood comes out but nothing very graphic.BFV has got a serious cheating problem, but it isn't so bad – it's just bad compared to other games. You might get a cheater every couple games, or once in a blue moon, you might get 3 games in a row with one.
Why do people prefer Battlefield 1 over 5 : Visually, they're very similar. But BFV is newer than BF1, so technically speaking it will have the better graphics. In terms of realism, BF1 is better by a long shot. Especially when it comes to the single player experience.
![Kladsko-5-malý-Karlův-Most[1]](https://www.einarstrayorchestra.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Kladsko-5-maly-Karluv-Most1-1024x692-250x120.jpg)
![Stubai[1]](https://www.einarstrayorchestra.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Stubai1-250x120.jpg)
Antwort Was Battlefield V failure? Weitere Antworten – Was Battlefield 5 a flop
Upon release, the game received generally positive reviews from critics, who praised its gameplay and new multiplayer modes but criticized for its shortage of content at launch and lack of innovation. It sold 7.3 million units by the end of 2018, but was a commercial disappointment for Electronic Arts.DICE and EA insulted the fanbase before it came out, and then abandoned the game less than 2 years after launch. Hopefully DICE can learn. With the addition of Battlefield Hardline in recent years, why does it seem that it hasn't gotten backlash from gamers, unlike Battlefield VAnd game overall. Then Battlefield 5 can feel a bit like a fresh Breeze. At least it did that for me. I usually play as a sniper in most FPS games and Battlefield 5 is no exception.
Do people still play BF5 : Period is huge for Battlefield 5 just under 60,000 players in 2024 and 2042 not even 20,000 so it's a third of Battlefield 5 it's insane how Battlefield 5 just remains popular after all these years so
What went wrong with BF5
Visibility: Visibility was simply horrible in BF5 and unfortunately some of these issues have persisted into 2042. Ping System: This was a bad Battle Royale import like many of the objectionable features, the 3D spotting system was much better for visibility and situation awareness.
Is Battlefield 5 or 2042 better : Both 2042 and BF5 had rough launches. The difference is, BF5 actually had the potential of being a good Battlefield game. 2042 is VERY far from that potential. Players are going back to BF5 now, because they miss their Battlefield dose- since 2042 does not give you that.
"[The V sign] represents 'V for Victory,'" the Battlefield Twitter account said. "The phrase and sign were popularised by Winston Churchill and used amongst the allies for much of WWII. It's also why we chose to use the Roman numeral V instead of the number 5 for the title."
There are also some gory moments, including gored men being shoveled into the snow(not clearly seen) and stacks of people with blood all over the place. (implying that they were executed). In the multiplayer, it is different. When you shoot someone, there are graphic blood spurts.
What made Battlefield 5 bad
The game is low on content with very little maps, the game throws away historical accuracy even though it was marketed as a realistic ww2 game. The devs promised consistent updates with new content and almost a year has went by with barely any new content brought into the game.6 Battlefield 1 Offers More Steady Gameplay & Better Weaponry. However, speaking about gameplay, Battlefield 1 should come home with the winning belt for this. Even though they're not as overpowered as Battlefield 5, the weaponry in this game did an excellent job highlighting the key technology of the era.Yes it is. There are more than 60 servers. There are like 300, and many players are playing it.
Both 2042 and BF5 had rough launches. The difference is, BF5 actually had the potential of being a good Battlefield game. 2042 is VERY far from that potential. Players are going back to BF5 now, because they miss their Battlefield dose- since 2042 does not give you that.
Why is Battlefield 5 controversial : Battlefield V's decision to prominently feature women in combat as part of its World War II setting may have angered some gamers online — who responded to the inclusion of female soldiers with the #NotMyBattlefield hashtag — but developers at Electronic Arts and DICE remain unmoved by the reaction.
Is Battlefield better than CoD : CoD or Battlefield – which is better Considering all the differences, gameplay details, and realistic graphics quality, we must admit that Battlefield is better. It's a solid title delivering high-quality graphics, giant maps, thrilling multiplayer, and accurate weapons.
Does battlefield 1 swear
Occasional profanity, including "f–k," "s–t." Outside of this, risk of other offensive language possible in team chats during multiplayer.
like the other battlefields have. Recommend for 13 year-old and maybe even mature 12 year-old. The game is not very gory the only time you really see blood is if you knife someone a little squirt of blood comes out but nothing very graphic.BFV has got a serious cheating problem, but it isn't so bad – it's just bad compared to other games. You might get a cheater every couple games, or once in a blue moon, you might get 3 games in a row with one.
Why do people prefer Battlefield 1 over 5 : Visually, they're very similar. But BFV is newer than BF1, so technically speaking it will have the better graphics. In terms of realism, BF1 is better by a long shot. Especially when it comes to the single player experience.