The Witcher 1 and 2 aren't necessary in the slightest. This isn't to say they're not good games, but in order to start anew with its own canon separate from the books, CD Projekt Red gave Geralt amnesia at the beginning of the first game.So in other words, storywise it doesn't make any difference which games you do or don't play before Witcher 3, because Witcher 3's story will still be a mess in every & any case. I never played Witcher 1 & 2 and didn't feel like Witcher 3's story is a mess. And obviously hundreds of thousands of people didn't.So, is it imperative that players experience The Witcher 1 & 2 before breaking into The Witcher 3: The Wild Hunt No, the third installment does a commendable job of bringing newcomers up to date with no prior knowledge of the world's lore.
Is Witcher 2 or 3 better : On the other hand, The Witcher 3 is a fair bit more permissive, with combat being smoother and faster, fitting in better with the open-world, free-roam structure. Geralt is also more resilient and quick healing with potions is more of an option than it was in TW2, which required you to drink all potions ahead of time.
Do I need to play Witcher 1 before 3
No One Needs To Play The First Witcher Games To Play Witcher 3.
Is it necessary to play Witcher 1 before 2 : The witcher game series handles much like the books. each game is it's own story, but each game has events and characters that relate through other games or books. because of this, you do not have to play one game to understand something in another. although it may make a little more sense.
Skipping to it (Assuming you're not done the witcher 1) wont be that bad, youll get the references to the game that they throw off during the begining of the witcher 2 which will be good. You definitely don't need to. The Witcher 3 does a good job of explaining things. Although in the Witcher 2 you'll see what happened earlier to some of the characters who will appear in The Witcher 3 such as Roche and Phillipa.
How many hours is the Witcher 1
When focusing on the main objectives, The Witcher is about 35½ Hours in length. If you're a gamer that strives to see all aspects of the game, you are likely to spend around 64 Hours to obtain 100% completion.OP, I disliked the first Witcher, but the second one is really better, I loved it, and the controls have changed immensely. You may or may not like it, but don't let the first Witcher's controls throw you off, they're not there anymore. It feels more like a Mass Effect with swords now, gameplay-wise.Yes, they're all related. Witcher 1, 2, 3 and any DLC in-between all take place in the same universe and in some instances choices you make in one game carry on into the other. Several choices, items, and a small amount of money are transferred to the sequel and are accessible at the start of the game. A small percentage of your orens (about 1% of your saved game from The Witcher added to the standard ~ 150 orens of a fresh game).
Is The Witcher 2 shorter than 1 : It is definitely shorter… Witcher 1 took me about 50 hours. This one took about 35-40… I tried to explore everything so you could run through it faster if you so desired.
Should I play Witcher 1 before playing Witcher 2 : Players that skip the first game will miss a worthwhile story, but a simple one that doesn't hold much importance for the remainder of the trilogy – though it leads into Witcher 2: Assassins of Kings' storyline.
![Kladsko-5-malý-Karlův-Most[1]](https://www.einarstrayorchestra.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Kladsko-5-maly-Karluv-Most1-1024x692-250x120.jpg)
![Stubai[1]](https://www.einarstrayorchestra.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Stubai1-250x120.jpg)
Antwort Should I start with the first Witcher? Weitere Antworten – Do I need to play The Witcher 1 and 2 before 3
You can skip The Witcher 1 and 2
The Witcher 1 and 2 aren't necessary in the slightest. This isn't to say they're not good games, but in order to start anew with its own canon separate from the books, CD Projekt Red gave Geralt amnesia at the beginning of the first game.So in other words, storywise it doesn't make any difference which games you do or don't play before Witcher 3, because Witcher 3's story will still be a mess in every & any case. I never played Witcher 1 & 2 and didn't feel like Witcher 3's story is a mess. And obviously hundreds of thousands of people didn't.So, is it imperative that players experience The Witcher 1 & 2 before breaking into The Witcher 3: The Wild Hunt No, the third installment does a commendable job of bringing newcomers up to date with no prior knowledge of the world's lore.
Is Witcher 2 or 3 better : On the other hand, The Witcher 3 is a fair bit more permissive, with combat being smoother and faster, fitting in better with the open-world, free-roam structure. Geralt is also more resilient and quick healing with potions is more of an option than it was in TW2, which required you to drink all potions ahead of time.
Do I need to play Witcher 1 before 3
No One Needs To Play The First Witcher Games To Play Witcher 3.
Is it necessary to play Witcher 1 before 2 : The witcher game series handles much like the books. each game is it's own story, but each game has events and characters that relate through other games or books. because of this, you do not have to play one game to understand something in another. although it may make a little more sense.
Skipping to it (Assuming you're not done the witcher 1) wont be that bad, youll get the references to the game that they throw off during the begining of the witcher 2 which will be good.
You definitely don't need to. The Witcher 3 does a good job of explaining things. Although in the Witcher 2 you'll see what happened earlier to some of the characters who will appear in The Witcher 3 such as Roche and Phillipa.
How many hours is the Witcher 1
When focusing on the main objectives, The Witcher is about 35½ Hours in length. If you're a gamer that strives to see all aspects of the game, you are likely to spend around 64 Hours to obtain 100% completion.OP, I disliked the first Witcher, but the second one is really better, I loved it, and the controls have changed immensely. You may or may not like it, but don't let the first Witcher's controls throw you off, they're not there anymore. It feels more like a Mass Effect with swords now, gameplay-wise.Yes, they're all related. Witcher 1, 2, 3 and any DLC in-between all take place in the same universe and in some instances choices you make in one game carry on into the other.
Several choices, items, and a small amount of money are transferred to the sequel and are accessible at the start of the game. A small percentage of your orens (about 1% of your saved game from The Witcher added to the standard ~ 150 orens of a fresh game).
Is The Witcher 2 shorter than 1 : It is definitely shorter… Witcher 1 took me about 50 hours. This one took about 35-40… I tried to explore everything so you could run through it faster if you so desired.
Should I play Witcher 1 before playing Witcher 2 : Players that skip the first game will miss a worthwhile story, but a simple one that doesn't hold much importance for the remainder of the trilogy – though it leads into Witcher 2: Assassins of Kings' storyline.