You won't miss much if you start from Witcher 3. There's a few characters that have side quests that you'll be confused on, but it's not that big of a deal. All of the important plot from Witcher 2 is given to you at the beginning of Witcher 3. Witcher 3 is better looking, much longer, and a bit more casual friendly.The Witcher 2 could be described as a mostly linear progression through hubs. It doesn't have the freely explorable world of TW3, instead as the plot progresses, you're taken to a different central location surrounded by a reasonably sized area focused on a manageable number of well-developed quests.It's story, characters and journey are well worth your time. If you played The Witcher 3 and think you'd still enjoy it without the open world you will definitely enjoy The Witcher 2.
Does The Witcher 2 still hold up : It is an older game and while the graphics held up well considering its age they can't compete with the latest releases Additionally. The game's world is more focused. And segmented.
Do I need to play Witcher 1 and 2 before
You can skip The Witcher 1 and 2
The Witcher 1 and 2 aren't necessary in the slightest.
Is Witcher 1, 2 and 3 connected : Unfortunately, some fans may be too wrapped up in the hype to realize that playing the first two games isn't necessary to enjoy the third. The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt focuses on the last chapter of Geralt of Rivia's written tale, culminating several games' worth of decisions and consequences.
While The Witcher 2 is a definite improvement over the previous games, it's still unnecessary to play to enjoy The Witcher 3. CDPR even expected this, as a mechanic in place allows players who started on The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt to determine Geralt's choices throughout the second game. So in other words, storywise it doesn't make any difference which games you do or don't play before Witcher 3, because Witcher 3's story will still be a mess in every & any case. I never played Witcher 1 & 2 and didn't feel like Witcher 3's story is a mess. And obviously hundreds of thousands of people didn't.
Do I need to play Witcher 1 and 2 before 3
You can skip The Witcher 1 and 2
The Witcher 1 and 2 aren't necessary in the slightest. This isn't to say they're not good games, but in order to start anew with its own canon separate from the books, CD Projekt Red gave Geralt amnesia at the beginning of the first game.OP, I disliked the first Witcher, but the second one is really better, I loved it, and the controls have changed immensely. You may or may not like it, but don't let the first Witcher's controls throw you off, they're not there anymore. It feels more like a Mass Effect with swords now, gameplay-wise.Powered by IGN Wiki Guides
Single-Player
Polled
Average
Main Story
1K
24h 24m
Main + Extras
2.4K
35h 22m
Completionist
419
58h 5m
All PlayStyles
3.9K
34h 52m
So in other words, storywise it doesn't make any difference which games you do or don't play before Witcher 3, because Witcher 3's story will still be a mess in every & any case. I never played Witcher 1 & 2 and didn't feel like Witcher 3's story is a mess. And obviously hundreds of thousands of people didn't.
Can I skip Witcher 1 and play Witcher 2 : Skipping to it (Assuming you're not done the witcher 1) wont be that bad, youll get the references to the game that they throw off during the begining of the witcher 2 which will be good.
Is it necessary to play Witcher 1 before 2 : The witcher game series handles much like the books. each game is it's own story, but each game has events and characters that relate through other games or books. because of this, you do not have to play one game to understand something in another. although it may make a little more sense.
Can I skip Witcher 1 and play witcher 2
Skipping to it (Assuming you're not done the witcher 1) wont be that bad, youll get the references to the game that they throw off during the begining of the witcher 2 which will be good. Is this really necessary CD Projekt Red announced that The Wild Hunt will be about 35 times larger than The Witcher 2. The Witcher 2 was already a fairly large game with a lot of options and side quests.It is definitely shorter… Witcher 1 took me about 50 hours. This one took about 35-40… I tried to explore everything so you could run through it faster if you so desired.
Are Witcher 1, 2 and 3 connected : Unfortunately, some fans may be too wrapped up in the hype to realize that playing the first two games isn't necessary to enjoy the third. The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt focuses on the last chapter of Geralt of Rivia's written tale, culminating several games' worth of decisions and consequences.
![Kladsko-5-malý-Karlův-Most[1]](https://www.einarstrayorchestra.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Kladsko-5-maly-Karluv-Most1-1024x692-250x120.jpg)
![Stubai[1]](https://www.einarstrayorchestra.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Stubai1-250x120.jpg)
Antwort Should I play Witcher 2 before? Weitere Antworten – Should I play The Witcher 2 or 3 first
You won't miss much if you start from Witcher 3. There's a few characters that have side quests that you'll be confused on, but it's not that big of a deal. All of the important plot from Witcher 2 is given to you at the beginning of Witcher 3. Witcher 3 is better looking, much longer, and a bit more casual friendly.The Witcher 2 could be described as a mostly linear progression through hubs. It doesn't have the freely explorable world of TW3, instead as the plot progresses, you're taken to a different central location surrounded by a reasonably sized area focused on a manageable number of well-developed quests.It's story, characters and journey are well worth your time. If you played The Witcher 3 and think you'd still enjoy it without the open world you will definitely enjoy The Witcher 2.
Does The Witcher 2 still hold up : It is an older game and while the graphics held up well considering its age they can't compete with the latest releases Additionally. The game's world is more focused. And segmented.
Do I need to play Witcher 1 and 2 before
You can skip The Witcher 1 and 2
The Witcher 1 and 2 aren't necessary in the slightest.
Is Witcher 1, 2 and 3 connected : Unfortunately, some fans may be too wrapped up in the hype to realize that playing the first two games isn't necessary to enjoy the third. The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt focuses on the last chapter of Geralt of Rivia's written tale, culminating several games' worth of decisions and consequences.
While The Witcher 2 is a definite improvement over the previous games, it's still unnecessary to play to enjoy The Witcher 3. CDPR even expected this, as a mechanic in place allows players who started on The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt to determine Geralt's choices throughout the second game.
So in other words, storywise it doesn't make any difference which games you do or don't play before Witcher 3, because Witcher 3's story will still be a mess in every & any case. I never played Witcher 1 & 2 and didn't feel like Witcher 3's story is a mess. And obviously hundreds of thousands of people didn't.
Do I need to play Witcher 1 and 2 before 3
You can skip The Witcher 1 and 2
The Witcher 1 and 2 aren't necessary in the slightest. This isn't to say they're not good games, but in order to start anew with its own canon separate from the books, CD Projekt Red gave Geralt amnesia at the beginning of the first game.OP, I disliked the first Witcher, but the second one is really better, I loved it, and the controls have changed immensely. You may or may not like it, but don't let the first Witcher's controls throw you off, they're not there anymore. It feels more like a Mass Effect with swords now, gameplay-wise.Powered by IGN Wiki Guides
So in other words, storywise it doesn't make any difference which games you do or don't play before Witcher 3, because Witcher 3's story will still be a mess in every & any case. I never played Witcher 1 & 2 and didn't feel like Witcher 3's story is a mess. And obviously hundreds of thousands of people didn't.
Can I skip Witcher 1 and play Witcher 2 : Skipping to it (Assuming you're not done the witcher 1) wont be that bad, youll get the references to the game that they throw off during the begining of the witcher 2 which will be good.
Is it necessary to play Witcher 1 before 2 : The witcher game series handles much like the books. each game is it's own story, but each game has events and characters that relate through other games or books. because of this, you do not have to play one game to understand something in another. although it may make a little more sense.
Can I skip Witcher 1 and play witcher 2
Skipping to it (Assuming you're not done the witcher 1) wont be that bad, youll get the references to the game that they throw off during the begining of the witcher 2 which will be good.
Is this really necessary CD Projekt Red announced that The Wild Hunt will be about 35 times larger than The Witcher 2. The Witcher 2 was already a fairly large game with a lot of options and side quests.It is definitely shorter… Witcher 1 took me about 50 hours. This one took about 35-40… I tried to explore everything so you could run through it faster if you so desired.
Are Witcher 1, 2 and 3 connected : Unfortunately, some fans may be too wrapped up in the hype to realize that playing the first two games isn't necessary to enjoy the third. The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt focuses on the last chapter of Geralt of Rivia's written tale, culminating several games' worth of decisions and consequences.