New Ant-Man is not a bad movie, but it's repeating current trend that been plaguing new Marvel productions. Main character is just an excuse to introduce few new characters that are definitely going to have their own stories. That makes Paul Rudd's character less important.Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania is aimed at older kids and teens. It's not suitable for children under 11 years and parental guidance is recommended for children aged 11-13 years.Ant-Man may not be the most memorable superhero film in the Marvel universe, but it's definitely worth a watch. Paul Rudd delivers a solid performance as Scott Lang, the charming and witty ex-con turned superhero.
Who is the villain in the new Ant-Man and Wasp movie : Kang the Conqueror
Jonathan Majors as Kang the Conqueror: A "time-traveling, multiversal adversary" trapped in the Quantum Realm who needs Pym Particles to get his ship and a device online that would allow him to go anywhere and when in time.
Is Ant-Man 3 a flop
'Ant-Man 3' Crashed at the Box Office After a Trilogy-Best Opening.
Why did Quantumania fail : The overall effect was a movie that didn't have the spirit of the previous Ant-Man movies and also wasn't breaking any new ground. It truly felt like Marvel was phoning it in, making a movie just to tease its next few movies. It's one thing to be bad while trying to do something ambitious.
There are many better films out there, but for some fun escapism and a good introduction to the Phase 5 villain and story-arc, it's definitely worth a watch. While family is still the heart and soul of Peyton Reed's third Ant-Man film, Quantumania breaks from tradition and delivers a decidedly Star Wars-infused story, complete with alien-filled cantinas, sand speeders, and the sort of “rise against our oppressor” messaging that is often lost within the Marvel Cinematic …
Can I skip Ant-Man 1
There's an argument to be made the original Ant-Man is more skippable, especially because the sequel introduces both generations of the Wasp to the superhero franchise. But Scott Lang is still too important to the MCU to omit his origin story. It also matters more to the events of Quantumania than his second movie.“Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania” took a sizable hit in its sophomore outing at the box office. Ticket sales for the third Marvel movie starring Paul Rudd's subatomic hero were down 69% from its $105 million debut, resulting in the biggest second-weekend drop in the franchise's history.For being a villain who has been to multiple dimensions, Kang in Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania feels largely one-dimensional. The issue here isn't Jonathan Majors's performance, as, again, his performances so far in the MCU have been absolutely stellar. Kang the Conqueror has been described as one of Marvel's most notable and powerful villains. Kang has made media appearances in animated television and video games.
What made quantumania so bad : “In the end, with its clumsy collision of influences, star power, CGI that is often rubbery or outright ugly, and a convoluted plot that should have an Excedrin tie-in, 'Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania' is like a child's mixed media project, made of paper mache, glitter, and hunks of rotting ground meat,” she said.
Did Quantumania lose money : Was the film profitable With a budget of $200 million and a box office result of $476 million.
Why does Ant-Man Quantumania look so bad
According to Vulture, visual effects artists contributing to Marvel's latest blockbuster were overworked and under-resourced, and part of the reason was because money was being diverted to another project, Black Panther: Wakanda Forever. Characters are constantly told how rough and tough Kang is or how fearsome killer ants from the future can be but are rarely ever shown; the audience is just told and expected to buy it, which leads to a much more dissatisfying payoff when these elements converge.Whilst Quantumania made a $38 million loss on its box office revenue, Marvel's team-up movies Avengers: Infinity War and Avengers: Endgame made $1.2 billion of profits as we revealed.
Did Ant-Man 3 do well : At this rate, “Ant-Man 3” may become one of the rare Marvel movies to either fall short of (or barely surpass) the $500 million mark at the global box office. At this point, it's earned just $470 million globally after six weeks of release.
![Kladsko-5-malý-Karlův-Most[1]](https://www.einarstrayorchestra.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Kladsko-5-maly-Karluv-Most1-1024x692-250x120.jpg)
![Stubai[1]](https://www.einarstrayorchestra.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Stubai1-250x120.jpg)
Antwort Is the new Ant-Man bad? Weitere Antworten – How bad is the new Ant-Man
New Ant-Man is not a bad movie, but it's repeating current trend that been plaguing new Marvel productions. Main character is just an excuse to introduce few new characters that are definitely going to have their own stories. That makes Paul Rudd's character less important.Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania is aimed at older kids and teens. It's not suitable for children under 11 years and parental guidance is recommended for children aged 11-13 years.Ant-Man may not be the most memorable superhero film in the Marvel universe, but it's definitely worth a watch. Paul Rudd delivers a solid performance as Scott Lang, the charming and witty ex-con turned superhero.
Who is the villain in the new Ant-Man and Wasp movie : Kang the Conqueror
Jonathan Majors as Kang the Conqueror: A "time-traveling, multiversal adversary" trapped in the Quantum Realm who needs Pym Particles to get his ship and a device online that would allow him to go anywhere and when in time.
Is Ant-Man 3 a flop
'Ant-Man 3' Crashed at the Box Office After a Trilogy-Best Opening.
Why did Quantumania fail : The overall effect was a movie that didn't have the spirit of the previous Ant-Man movies and also wasn't breaking any new ground. It truly felt like Marvel was phoning it in, making a movie just to tease its next few movies. It's one thing to be bad while trying to do something ambitious.
There are many better films out there, but for some fun escapism and a good introduction to the Phase 5 villain and story-arc, it's definitely worth a watch.
While family is still the heart and soul of Peyton Reed's third Ant-Man film, Quantumania breaks from tradition and delivers a decidedly Star Wars-infused story, complete with alien-filled cantinas, sand speeders, and the sort of “rise against our oppressor” messaging that is often lost within the Marvel Cinematic …
Can I skip Ant-Man 1
There's an argument to be made the original Ant-Man is more skippable, especially because the sequel introduces both generations of the Wasp to the superhero franchise. But Scott Lang is still too important to the MCU to omit his origin story. It also matters more to the events of Quantumania than his second movie.“Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania” took a sizable hit in its sophomore outing at the box office. Ticket sales for the third Marvel movie starring Paul Rudd's subatomic hero were down 69% from its $105 million debut, resulting in the biggest second-weekend drop in the franchise's history.For being a villain who has been to multiple dimensions, Kang in Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania feels largely one-dimensional. The issue here isn't Jonathan Majors's performance, as, again, his performances so far in the MCU have been absolutely stellar.
Kang the Conqueror has been described as one of Marvel's most notable and powerful villains. Kang has made media appearances in animated television and video games.
What made quantumania so bad : “In the end, with its clumsy collision of influences, star power, CGI that is often rubbery or outright ugly, and a convoluted plot that should have an Excedrin tie-in, 'Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania' is like a child's mixed media project, made of paper mache, glitter, and hunks of rotting ground meat,” she said.
Did Quantumania lose money : Was the film profitable With a budget of $200 million and a box office result of $476 million.
Why does Ant-Man Quantumania look so bad
According to Vulture, visual effects artists contributing to Marvel's latest blockbuster were overworked and under-resourced, and part of the reason was because money was being diverted to another project, Black Panther: Wakanda Forever.
Characters are constantly told how rough and tough Kang is or how fearsome killer ants from the future can be but are rarely ever shown; the audience is just told and expected to buy it, which leads to a much more dissatisfying payoff when these elements converge.Whilst Quantumania made a $38 million loss on its box office revenue, Marvel's team-up movies Avengers: Infinity War and Avengers: Endgame made $1.2 billion of profits as we revealed.
Did Ant-Man 3 do well : At this rate, “Ant-Man 3” may become one of the rare Marvel movies to either fall short of (or barely surpass) the $500 million mark at the global box office. At this point, it's earned just $470 million globally after six weeks of release.