The film received mixed reviews from critics. It was a box-office disappointment, grossing $476.1 million worldwide against a gross production budget of $326.6 million, and was one of the few MCU films not to break even in its theatrical run.Damn,that makes it awful. But after watching the movie,I will use a chance to review it a bit and say that Rotten Tomatoes is b.s. Total,absolute b.s. Yes the Rotten-tomatoes critics rating for 3rd installment of Ant-Man is very low at 48% (Feb 17, 2023) but the user ratings are at 84%.Not only did the third installment in the Ant-Man franchise reject the same light tone of its predecessors, but the narrative was jumbled, its CGI was some of Marvel's dodgiest in years, and it somehow managed to waste one of the studio's most charming talents, Paul Rudd.
Is Ant-Man Quantumania the worst : Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania: The worst Marvel film yet. The latest film about the minuscule superhero sets up Marvel's next big villain but other than that, it has nothing to offer beyond drab-looking action, writes Caryn James.
What made quantumania so bad
“In the end, with its clumsy collision of influences, star power, CGI that is often rubbery or outright ugly, and a convoluted plot that should have an Excedrin tie-in, 'Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania' is like a child's mixed media project, made of paper mache, glitter, and hunks of rotting ground meat,” she said.
Why did Quantumania fail : The overall effect was a movie that didn't have the spirit of the previous Ant-Man movies and also wasn't breaking any new ground. It truly felt like Marvel was phoning it in, making a movie just to tease its next few movies. It's one thing to be bad while trying to do something ambitious.
Was the film profitable With a budget of $200 million and a box office result of $476 million. The overall effect was a movie that didn't have the spirit of the previous Ant-Man movies and also wasn't breaking any new ground. It truly felt like Marvel was phoning it in, making a movie just to tease its next few movies. It's one thing to be bad while trying to do something ambitious.
Why was Quantumania a flop
Critically, the movie bombed, earning just a 46% critical rating on Rotten Tomatoes, with the consensus calling out the film for lacking emotional depth and enjoyment. While the Ant-Man threequel attracted an 83% audience score, fans bemoaned a messy plot despite the creativity it tried to showcase throughout.This movie was only made to introduce Kang and nothing else. The writers don't care about characterization or character arcs or even writing a decent plot with what they've got. Why even make this movie when we had Kang introduced in Loki This adds nothing and is repetitive."In the end, with its clumsy collision of influences, star power, CGI that is often rubbery or outright ugly, and a convoluted plot that should have an Excedrin tie-in, 'Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania' is like a child's mixed media project, made of paper mache, glitter, and hunks of rotting ground meat," she said. Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania by itself was a decent, average movie that had its moments while also having their cringy moments also. But for the beginning/start-up of Phase 5, not going to lie: it sets up Phase 5 very well.
Why did people hate Ant-Man Quantumania : Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania, it's sad to say, is not good. It is not good in many, many ways. The weirdly blank performances, the thunderingly dull fights, the nothingy plot: it is not good.
Why does Ant-Man Quantumania look so bad : According to Vulture, visual effects artists contributing to Marvel's latest blockbuster were overworked and under-resourced, and part of the reason was because money was being diverted to another project, Black Panther: Wakanda Forever.
Why people don’t like Quantumania
One of the most common complaints about Quantumania lies in the VFX work. Many feel the whole package is simply lackluster, with most of it looking rubbery and cheap—anything but convincing. It doesn't help that one key character is an odd-looking floating head. In what was disappointing for many, Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania failed at the box office, at least in comparison to the MCU's usually high standards.Seeing the review scores roll in for Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania, it was surprising to see that it was shaping up to be the second-ever “rotten” reviewed MCU movie, teetering just a single percentage point above Eternals, 48% to 47%. But!
What made Quantumania so bad : “In the end, with its clumsy collision of influences, star power, CGI that is often rubbery or outright ugly, and a convoluted plot that should have an Excedrin tie-in, 'Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania' is like a child's mixed media project, made of paper mache, glitter, and hunks of rotting ground meat,” she said.
![Kladsko-5-malý-Karlův-Most[1]](https://www.einarstrayorchestra.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Kladsko-5-maly-Karluv-Most1-1024x692-250x120.jpg)
![Stubai[1]](https://www.einarstrayorchestra.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Stubai1-250x120.jpg)
Antwort Is Ant-Man 3 that bad? Weitere Antworten – Is Ant-Man 3 a flop movie
The film received mixed reviews from critics. It was a box-office disappointment, grossing $476.1 million worldwide against a gross production budget of $326.6 million, and was one of the few MCU films not to break even in its theatrical run.Damn,that makes it awful. But after watching the movie,I will use a chance to review it a bit and say that Rotten Tomatoes is b.s. Total,absolute b.s. Yes the Rotten-tomatoes critics rating for 3rd installment of Ant-Man is very low at 48% (Feb 17, 2023) but the user ratings are at 84%.Not only did the third installment in the Ant-Man franchise reject the same light tone of its predecessors, but the narrative was jumbled, its CGI was some of Marvel's dodgiest in years, and it somehow managed to waste one of the studio's most charming talents, Paul Rudd.
Is Ant-Man Quantumania the worst : Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania: The worst Marvel film yet. The latest film about the minuscule superhero sets up Marvel's next big villain but other than that, it has nothing to offer beyond drab-looking action, writes Caryn James.
What made quantumania so bad
“In the end, with its clumsy collision of influences, star power, CGI that is often rubbery or outright ugly, and a convoluted plot that should have an Excedrin tie-in, 'Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania' is like a child's mixed media project, made of paper mache, glitter, and hunks of rotting ground meat,” she said.
Why did Quantumania fail : The overall effect was a movie that didn't have the spirit of the previous Ant-Man movies and also wasn't breaking any new ground. It truly felt like Marvel was phoning it in, making a movie just to tease its next few movies. It's one thing to be bad while trying to do something ambitious.
Was the film profitable With a budget of $200 million and a box office result of $476 million.
The overall effect was a movie that didn't have the spirit of the previous Ant-Man movies and also wasn't breaking any new ground. It truly felt like Marvel was phoning it in, making a movie just to tease its next few movies. It's one thing to be bad while trying to do something ambitious.
Why was Quantumania a flop
Critically, the movie bombed, earning just a 46% critical rating on Rotten Tomatoes, with the consensus calling out the film for lacking emotional depth and enjoyment. While the Ant-Man threequel attracted an 83% audience score, fans bemoaned a messy plot despite the creativity it tried to showcase throughout.This movie was only made to introduce Kang and nothing else. The writers don't care about characterization or character arcs or even writing a decent plot with what they've got. Why even make this movie when we had Kang introduced in Loki This adds nothing and is repetitive."In the end, with its clumsy collision of influences, star power, CGI that is often rubbery or outright ugly, and a convoluted plot that should have an Excedrin tie-in, 'Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania' is like a child's mixed media project, made of paper mache, glitter, and hunks of rotting ground meat," she said.
Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania by itself was a decent, average movie that had its moments while also having their cringy moments also. But for the beginning/start-up of Phase 5, not going to lie: it sets up Phase 5 very well.
Why did people hate Ant-Man Quantumania : Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania, it's sad to say, is not good. It is not good in many, many ways. The weirdly blank performances, the thunderingly dull fights, the nothingy plot: it is not good.
Why does Ant-Man Quantumania look so bad : According to Vulture, visual effects artists contributing to Marvel's latest blockbuster were overworked and under-resourced, and part of the reason was because money was being diverted to another project, Black Panther: Wakanda Forever.
Why people don’t like Quantumania
One of the most common complaints about Quantumania lies in the VFX work. Many feel the whole package is simply lackluster, with most of it looking rubbery and cheap—anything but convincing. It doesn't help that one key character is an odd-looking floating head.
In what was disappointing for many, Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania failed at the box office, at least in comparison to the MCU's usually high standards.Seeing the review scores roll in for Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania, it was surprising to see that it was shaping up to be the second-ever “rotten” reviewed MCU movie, teetering just a single percentage point above Eternals, 48% to 47%. But!
What made Quantumania so bad : “In the end, with its clumsy collision of influences, star power, CGI that is often rubbery or outright ugly, and a convoluted plot that should have an Excedrin tie-in, 'Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania' is like a child's mixed media project, made of paper mache, glitter, and hunks of rotting ground meat,” she said.