Antwort How much did Napoleon lose in Russia? Weitere Antworten – What did Napoleon lose in Russia

How much did Napoleon lose in Russia?
The result was a disaster for the French. The Russian army refused to engage with Napoleon's Grande Armée of more than 500,000 European troops. They simply retreated into the Russian interior. The Grande Armée did not have the supplies or the distribution networks required for such a long march.25, Napoleon had lost 105,000 of his main army of 265,000, leaving just 160,000 soldiers. Within two weeks, typhus had reduced the army to 103,000. Gen. Mikhail Kutusov of the Russian forces set up a defensive position in Borodino, about 70 miles west of Moscow.“Had Napoleon beaten the Russians,” concludes Professor Broers, “there wouldn't have really been much trouble left inside Europe to threaten him. A unified Germany would have been impossible as long as France was strong. Poland would have been united and strong, and never conquered again.

How many did Napoleon lose : seven
Napoleon as a Leader. The military career of Napoleon Bonaparte lasted more than 20 years. He is widely regarded as a military genius and one of the finest commanders in world history. He fought 60 battles and lost only seven, most of these at the end of his career.

How close did Napoleon get to Moscow

To start with, Napoleon did not attack Moscow. He did attack the Russian army near the village of Borodino. He pretended that this battle was “under the walls of Moscow” but in reality, the old Russian capital was still more than 100 km away (not that it is a big distance in Russia, of course).

Why did Tsar Alexander betray Napoleon : He realised that in Napoleon sentiment never got the better of reason, that as a matter of fact he had never intended his proposed "grand enterprise" seriously, and had only used it to preoccupy the mind of the Tsar while he consolidated his own power in Central Europe.

Casualties and consequences

The French themselves lost 70,000 in action and 120,000 wounded, as against the non-French contingents' 30,000 and 60,000. Russian casualties have been estimated at 200,000 killed, 50,000 dispersed or deserting, and 150,000 wounded.

Nearly 200-250,000 soldiers of the Grande Armée died in combat, 150,000 or even 200,000 were made prisoner, and 50-60,000 marauders and deserters, who became tutors, domestic servants or farmhands, apparently hid in Russia and survived thanks to the involvement of the local population.

Would Wellington have won without Blucher

Even so, if the Prussian Army under Blücher had not arrived in the afternoon of the battle, it is highly probable that Wellington´s force would have been swept away. In total, the allied armies were 210 890 men, of which 73% were either Prussian or German.The Battle of Waterloo
The Battle of Waterloo was fought on 18 June 1815 between Napoleon's French Army and a coalition led by the Duke of Wellington and Marshal Blücher. The decisive battle of its age, it concluded a war that had raged for 23 years, ended French attempts to dominate Europe, and destroyed Napoleon's imperial power forever.two thirds
As soon as Napoleon and his Grand Army entered Moscow, on 14 September 1812, the capital erupted in flames that eventually engulfed and destroyed two thirds of the city.

The greatest fear of the Russian government, of course, was that Napoleon would pose as the liberator of the serfs. Rumours spread amongst the serfs before the invasion that this was Napoleon's intention, and the Russian government responded by stationing troops in each province to counter any peasant unrest.

What destroyed most of Napoleon’s grand army : The French Grand Army was decimated by a lack of food supplies caused by situations that had a significant connection to rivers. Various river crossings on the retreat from Moscow served as an additional deadly task for the French that helped bring an end to their dominance of Europe in the early nineteenth century.

How good of a general was Blücher : Blücher was by no means the most skilled battlefield tactician, and relentless aggression was not always welcome, but his drive and determination in the 1813-14 campaigns as well as his commitment to supporting Wellington and Waterloo wins him a place on this list.

Who was better Napoleon or Wellington

In this battle, Napoleon evidently had health problems, and Wellington was still at his peak. But if you look at the whole of Napoleon's career overall, you may conclude that he was superior. Wellington was very good at reading landscapes and knowing things like “what was on the other side of the hill”.

At the time of his death, the French might have recorded his height in French inches, which were a little longer than English inches. They put him at five-foot-two, but this was probably more like 5 feet and 6.5 inches, a perfectly normal height for a man of his time.Napoleon actually fought in 78 military engagements and commanded in 76 of them, to include battles, clashes, skirmishes, sieges etc. He won 64 of those and lost 12, giving a win rate of 84%. Of purely pitched battles, he fought 67, won 57 and lost 10, giving a win rate of 85%.

Has Moscow ever fallen : In the mid-16th century Ivan IV (the Terrible) conquered the Mongol khanates of Kazan (1552) and Astrakhan (1556), but in 1571 the Crimean Tatars captured Moscow, burning everything but the Kremlin. The annals record that only 30,000 of 200,000 inhabitants survived.