It's story, characters and journey are well worth your time. If you played The Witcher 3 and think you'd still enjoy it without the open world you will definitely enjoy The Witcher 2.The Witcher 2 could be described as a mostly linear progression through hubs. It doesn't have the freely explorable world of TW3, instead as the plot progresses, you're taken to a different central location surrounded by a reasonably sized area focused on a manageable number of well-developed quests.
Is Witcher 2 open world : The first two Witcher games are non-linear, which leads some people to think that means they're full open-world, and that's not quite the case. While both give the player little sandboxes to play in, with a good amount of sidequests, they aren't nearly as open as Wild Hunt.
Is The Witcher 2 longer than 3
Is this really necessary CD Projekt Red announced that The Wild Hunt will be about 35 times larger than The Witcher 2. The Witcher 2 was already a fairly large game with a lot of options and side quests.
Is The Witcher 2 shorter than 1 : It is definitely shorter… Witcher 1 took me about 50 hours. This one took about 35-40… I tried to explore everything so you could run through it faster if you so desired.
While The Witcher 2 is a definite improvement over the previous games, it's still unnecessary to play to enjoy The Witcher 3. CDPR even expected this, as a mechanic in place allows players who started on The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt to determine Geralt's choices throughout the second game. OP, I disliked the first Witcher, but the second one is really better, I loved it, and the controls have changed immensely. You may or may not like it, but don't let the first Witcher's controls throw you off, they're not there anymore. It feels more like a Mass Effect with swords now, gameplay-wise.
Is The Witcher 2 hard
The combat is tough when you're just starting out. You must get the Position skill in the swordsmanship tree ASAP. Otherwise attacks from behind will deal 200% damage which will kill you very quickly. Be sure to use Quen to minimize damage you take.You won't miss much if you start from Witcher 3. There's a few characters that have side quests that you'll be confused on, but it's not that big of a deal. All of the important plot from Witcher 2 is given to you at the beginning of Witcher 3. Witcher 3 is better looking, much longer, and a bit more casual friendly.It starts out hard and gets much easier as things go on. Most of the difficulty comes from them not doing a very good job of explaining how to play and lacking any kind of worthwhile tutorial. Once you figure out how to play its not so bad, and gets even easier as you gain more powerful abilities from leveling up. The Witcher 2 introduced more critical aspects of the universe, including other witcher schools, monarchs, and military leaders connected with world-changing conflicts. While The Witcher 2 is a definite improvement over the previous games, it's still unnecessary to play to enjoy The Witcher 3.
Is The Witcher 3 harder than 2 : It's an open world game, but each zone generally has the same cookie cutter feel. I think it took me under 200 hours to complete all content and DLCs in Witcher 3, but Witcher 2 took under 100. Getting into W2 after playing W3 will be hard. Unless you become a fan or just really like The Witcher.
Why witcher 2 is better than 3 : By being more linear, The Witcher 2 feels more focused and to the point, having quests and side quests that don't deviate too much from the base plot. This contrasts the main questline of the third game, where you have to run back and forth with little advancement.
Should I start with Witcher 1 2 or 3
You won't miss much if you start from Witcher 3. There's a few characters that have side quests that you'll be confused on, but it's not that big of a deal. All of the important plot from Witcher 2 is given to you at the beginning of Witcher 3. Witcher 3 is better looking, much longer, and a bit more casual friendly. While The Witcher 2 is a definite improvement over the previous games, it's still unnecessary to play to enjoy The Witcher 3. CDPR even expected this, as a mechanic in place allows players who started on The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt to determine Geralt's choices throughout the second game.I actually found The Witcher 2's combat a bit more difficult in some ways compared to Dark Souls, but I'm playing on the hardest difficulty. I can safely say I love both games and cannot wait for The Witcher 3 and Dark Souls 2. I love this game, but i think the hardest part of this game is the wierd enemy AI.
Why is The Witcher 2 so difficult : The combat is tough when you're just starting out. You must get the Position skill in the swordsmanship tree ASAP. Otherwise attacks from behind will deal 200% damage which will kill you very quickly. Be sure to use Quen to minimize damage you take.
![Kladsko-5-malý-Karlův-Most[1]](https://www.einarstrayorchestra.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Kladsko-5-maly-Karluv-Most1-1024x692-250x120.jpg)
![Stubai[1]](https://www.einarstrayorchestra.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Stubai1-250x120.jpg)
Antwort How long is Witcher 2? Weitere Antworten – How long is the Witcher 2 campaign
Powered by IGN Wiki Guides
It's story, characters and journey are well worth your time. If you played The Witcher 3 and think you'd still enjoy it without the open world you will definitely enjoy The Witcher 2.The Witcher 2 could be described as a mostly linear progression through hubs. It doesn't have the freely explorable world of TW3, instead as the plot progresses, you're taken to a different central location surrounded by a reasonably sized area focused on a manageable number of well-developed quests.
Is Witcher 2 open world : The first two Witcher games are non-linear, which leads some people to think that means they're full open-world, and that's not quite the case. While both give the player little sandboxes to play in, with a good amount of sidequests, they aren't nearly as open as Wild Hunt.
Is The Witcher 2 longer than 3
Is this really necessary CD Projekt Red announced that The Wild Hunt will be about 35 times larger than The Witcher 2. The Witcher 2 was already a fairly large game with a lot of options and side quests.
Is The Witcher 2 shorter than 1 : It is definitely shorter… Witcher 1 took me about 50 hours. This one took about 35-40… I tried to explore everything so you could run through it faster if you so desired.
While The Witcher 2 is a definite improvement over the previous games, it's still unnecessary to play to enjoy The Witcher 3. CDPR even expected this, as a mechanic in place allows players who started on The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt to determine Geralt's choices throughout the second game.
OP, I disliked the first Witcher, but the second one is really better, I loved it, and the controls have changed immensely. You may or may not like it, but don't let the first Witcher's controls throw you off, they're not there anymore. It feels more like a Mass Effect with swords now, gameplay-wise.
Is The Witcher 2 hard
The combat is tough when you're just starting out. You must get the Position skill in the swordsmanship tree ASAP. Otherwise attacks from behind will deal 200% damage which will kill you very quickly. Be sure to use Quen to minimize damage you take.You won't miss much if you start from Witcher 3. There's a few characters that have side quests that you'll be confused on, but it's not that big of a deal. All of the important plot from Witcher 2 is given to you at the beginning of Witcher 3. Witcher 3 is better looking, much longer, and a bit more casual friendly.It starts out hard and gets much easier as things go on. Most of the difficulty comes from them not doing a very good job of explaining how to play and lacking any kind of worthwhile tutorial. Once you figure out how to play its not so bad, and gets even easier as you gain more powerful abilities from leveling up.
The Witcher 2 introduced more critical aspects of the universe, including other witcher schools, monarchs, and military leaders connected with world-changing conflicts. While The Witcher 2 is a definite improvement over the previous games, it's still unnecessary to play to enjoy The Witcher 3.
Is The Witcher 3 harder than 2 : It's an open world game, but each zone generally has the same cookie cutter feel. I think it took me under 200 hours to complete all content and DLCs in Witcher 3, but Witcher 2 took under 100. Getting into W2 after playing W3 will be hard. Unless you become a fan or just really like The Witcher.
Why witcher 2 is better than 3 : By being more linear, The Witcher 2 feels more focused and to the point, having quests and side quests that don't deviate too much from the base plot. This contrasts the main questline of the third game, where you have to run back and forth with little advancement.
Should I start with Witcher 1 2 or 3
You won't miss much if you start from Witcher 3. There's a few characters that have side quests that you'll be confused on, but it's not that big of a deal. All of the important plot from Witcher 2 is given to you at the beginning of Witcher 3. Witcher 3 is better looking, much longer, and a bit more casual friendly.
While The Witcher 2 is a definite improvement over the previous games, it's still unnecessary to play to enjoy The Witcher 3. CDPR even expected this, as a mechanic in place allows players who started on The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt to determine Geralt's choices throughout the second game.I actually found The Witcher 2's combat a bit more difficult in some ways compared to Dark Souls, but I'm playing on the hardest difficulty. I can safely say I love both games and cannot wait for The Witcher 3 and Dark Souls 2. I love this game, but i think the hardest part of this game is the wierd enemy AI.
Why is The Witcher 2 so difficult : The combat is tough when you're just starting out. You must get the Position skill in the swordsmanship tree ASAP. Otherwise attacks from behind will deal 200% damage which will kill you very quickly. Be sure to use Quen to minimize damage you take.