Road: 330 km (210 mi) Cross-country: 200 km (120 mi)
Maximum speed
53 km/h (33 mph)
In some ways the t-34 does infact have better armour than the tiger 1 at by it beeing sloped wich causes some shells to ricochet at high angles. The germans later adopted this sloped armour technology for their later tanks like the panther and tiger 2.The T-34 is discussed here as a case history. (8) In summary, the T-34/76's inherent fire control efficiency was so bad that even well trained and experienced tank crews were put at a severe disadvantage. For inexperienced tank crews, with no radios and probably no organised combined arms support, it was a disaster.
Is T-34 a true story : The creators do not pretend that the T-34 is a picture of real events, at its core it is "a pure fantasy adapted for teenagers". The critic notes the schematic plot and the weak development of the characters. "This is exemplary fearlessness, this programmatic heroism is a little embarrassing.
Is 3 tank top speed
IS-3
Transmission
4 forward, 1 reverse
Operational range
150 km (93 mi)/120 km (75 mi) (on/off-road)
Maximum speed
37 km/h (23 mph)/19 km/h (12 mph) (on/off-road)
References
What is the weakness of the T-34 : The T-34 (1940) has a weak turret, which even low-tier guns can penetrate. It is recommended to aim for the turret ring, as the cramped crew compartment will result in an easy crew kill. Another weak spot of the T-34 is the turret cheeks – there are some flat spots that are 45 mm, disabling the turret crew and the gun.
They were highly effective at destroying enemy Tigers. The Soviets also developed the 85 mm anti-tank gun, which was mounted on the ferociously mass-produced T-34s to form the T-34-85. Later came the SU-85, which could effectively knock out Tigers from a greater distance. They're both good in different situations. Pz IV has a MUCH better gun with actual depression and ammo selection, but no armor. T-34 has better mobility and incredibly troll-y armor, but a far worse gun with practically no depression.
Why was the T-34 so good
The T-34/76 was dominant in the early stages of the Second World War and came as a nasty surprise to the Germans in 1941. The T-34/76 was a Russian medium tank which first saw service in 1940. It had a truly long lasting impact on the battlefield, with an impressive balance of firepower, armour protection and mobility.There were something like 51,583 T-34s of all models built during the war and a total of 55,900 medium tanks received by the Soviet Army including the lend-lease that reached them. If they lost all of the lend-lease tanks among the 44,900 medium tanks they had lost, they would have 11,000 medium tanks left.Moreover, a more recent version of the Ripsaw tank—the SSR1 Super Sand Rail, which features a supercharged 727ci big-block making 1,500 horsepower —is capable of speeds in excess of 100 mph! The typical top speed was 37 km/h, and the practical range was only 150 km. Chelyabinsk Kirov Plant was responsible for the IS-1 manufacturing, and the first IS-1 rolled off the line in October 1943, but production was halted in January 1944 as the IS-1 was swiftly replaced by the all-round better IS-2.
Could a T-34 destroy a tiger : They were highly effective at destroying enemy Tigers. The Soviets also developed the 85 mm anti-tank gun, which was mounted on the ferociously mass-produced T-34s to form the T-34-85. Later came the SU-85, which could effectively knock out Tigers from a greater distance.
Did the Germans fear the T-34 : Prior to the invasion of the Soviet Union during World War II, the German armed forces were not aware of two newly developed Soviet tanks, the T-34 and the KV. As a result, they were surprised when they met them in combat for the first time in June 1941.
Was the T-34 better than the Panzer
German tank guns proved to be somewhat ineffective at greater range and within the lethality envelope of the F-34 tank gun used by the T-34 and KV-1. Generally, the T-34 outclassed the existing Panzer III and short-barreled Panzer IV medium tanks. At least one Panzer IV was documented to have been knocked out by a Sherman on the last day of the war. And thus, the last fight ever between a Sherman and a Panzer IV took place 22 years after the end of World War II.(25 miles) per hour
IV had a larger turret and gun, thicker frontal armour, and better cross-country mobility. It mounted a 75-mm gun and two machine guns and was protected by armour ranging in thickness from 30 to 80 mm. It weighed 25 tons, had a top road speed of 40 km (25 miles) per hour, and carried a crew of five.
Is the T-34-57 bad : The T-34-57 can be played in a variety of roles. The gun is very accurate and has high penetration, making it a great sniper. The tank is fast and manoeuvrable, making it a good flanker. It can also brawl due to its fast turret rotation and great reload speed.
![Kladsko-5-malý-Karlův-Most[1]](https://www.einarstrayorchestra.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Kladsko-5-maly-Karluv-Most1-1024x692-250x120.jpg)
![Stubai[1]](https://www.einarstrayorchestra.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Stubai1-250x120.jpg)
Antwort How fast can a T-34 go? Weitere Antworten – How fast can a T-34 tank go
In some ways the t-34 does infact have better armour than the tiger 1 at by it beeing sloped wich causes some shells to ricochet at high angles. The germans later adopted this sloped armour technology for their later tanks like the panther and tiger 2.The T-34 is discussed here as a case history. (8) In summary, the T-34/76's inherent fire control efficiency was so bad that even well trained and experienced tank crews were put at a severe disadvantage. For inexperienced tank crews, with no radios and probably no organised combined arms support, it was a disaster.
Is T-34 a true story : The creators do not pretend that the T-34 is a picture of real events, at its core it is "a pure fantasy adapted for teenagers". The critic notes the schematic plot and the weak development of the characters. "This is exemplary fearlessness, this programmatic heroism is a little embarrassing.
Is 3 tank top speed
What is the weakness of the T-34 : The T-34 (1940) has a weak turret, which even low-tier guns can penetrate. It is recommended to aim for the turret ring, as the cramped crew compartment will result in an easy crew kill. Another weak spot of the T-34 is the turret cheeks – there are some flat spots that are 45 mm, disabling the turret crew and the gun.
They were highly effective at destroying enemy Tigers. The Soviets also developed the 85 mm anti-tank gun, which was mounted on the ferociously mass-produced T-34s to form the T-34-85. Later came the SU-85, which could effectively knock out Tigers from a greater distance.
They're both good in different situations. Pz IV has a MUCH better gun with actual depression and ammo selection, but no armor. T-34 has better mobility and incredibly troll-y armor, but a far worse gun with practically no depression.
Why was the T-34 so good
The T-34/76 was dominant in the early stages of the Second World War and came as a nasty surprise to the Germans in 1941. The T-34/76 was a Russian medium tank which first saw service in 1940. It had a truly long lasting impact on the battlefield, with an impressive balance of firepower, armour protection and mobility.There were something like 51,583 T-34s of all models built during the war and a total of 55,900 medium tanks received by the Soviet Army including the lend-lease that reached them. If they lost all of the lend-lease tanks among the 44,900 medium tanks they had lost, they would have 11,000 medium tanks left.Moreover, a more recent version of the Ripsaw tank—the SSR1 Super Sand Rail, which features a supercharged 727ci big-block making 1,500 horsepower —is capable of speeds in excess of 100 mph!
The typical top speed was 37 km/h, and the practical range was only 150 km. Chelyabinsk Kirov Plant was responsible for the IS-1 manufacturing, and the first IS-1 rolled off the line in October 1943, but production was halted in January 1944 as the IS-1 was swiftly replaced by the all-round better IS-2.
Could a T-34 destroy a tiger : They were highly effective at destroying enemy Tigers. The Soviets also developed the 85 mm anti-tank gun, which was mounted on the ferociously mass-produced T-34s to form the T-34-85. Later came the SU-85, which could effectively knock out Tigers from a greater distance.
Did the Germans fear the T-34 : Prior to the invasion of the Soviet Union during World War II, the German armed forces were not aware of two newly developed Soviet tanks, the T-34 and the KV. As a result, they were surprised when they met them in combat for the first time in June 1941.
Was the T-34 better than the Panzer
German tank guns proved to be somewhat ineffective at greater range and within the lethality envelope of the F-34 tank gun used by the T-34 and KV-1. Generally, the T-34 outclassed the existing Panzer III and short-barreled Panzer IV medium tanks.
At least one Panzer IV was documented to have been knocked out by a Sherman on the last day of the war. And thus, the last fight ever between a Sherman and a Panzer IV took place 22 years after the end of World War II.(25 miles) per hour
IV had a larger turret and gun, thicker frontal armour, and better cross-country mobility. It mounted a 75-mm gun and two machine guns and was protected by armour ranging in thickness from 30 to 80 mm. It weighed 25 tons, had a top road speed of 40 km (25 miles) per hour, and carried a crew of five.
Is the T-34-57 bad : The T-34-57 can be played in a variety of roles. The gun is very accurate and has high penetration, making it a great sniper. The tank is fast and manoeuvrable, making it a good flanker. It can also brawl due to its fast turret rotation and great reload speed.