Antwort Does PC Building Simulator use real parts? Weitere Antworten – Is PC Builder Simulator realistic

Does PC Building Simulator use real parts?
It's all a simulation. The benchmarks in the game have nothing at all to do with real life. Actually, the 3DMark benchmark scores and Cinebench benchmark scores, are both based on the real life numbers, as closely as possible, per the devs. They are meant to be simulated accurately to real life.It can be a great resource for people who want to learn more about PC building, or it can also be used to visualize your dream build, minus all the extra time and money.All of the parts exist in the real world and are fully licensed with all their accurate sizings and compatibility perks, with the weird side effect that your main PC also starts with the same background as your desktop in the real world, letting you get immersed into the world in seconds.

What parts does PC Building Simulator have : All Components

  • 1 Tools And Software.
  • 2 Cases. 2.1 ADATA. 2.1.1 ADATA XPG Battlecruiser.
  • 3 Case Fans. 3.1 ADATA. 3.2 Antec.
  • 4 CPUs. 4.1 AMD. 4.1.1 Ryzen 3.
  • 5 CPU Cooling. 5.1 ADATA. 5.1.1 ADATA XPG LEVANTE.
  • 6 Motherboards. 6.1 ASRock. 6.1.1 ASRock B450.
  • 7 Memory/RAM. 7.1 ADATA. 7.1.1 ADATA 4 GB.
  • 8 Graphics Cards. 8.1 AMD.

Is PC Simulator 2 better than 1

The graphics, building options and PC building itself are improved. Spraying, stickering, water cooling have been added. Tuning has improved, and so has the design of your computer store. Overall, PC Building Simulator 2 is a very well-rounded and expanded game compared to the first one.

Is PC Simulator worth it : PC Building Simulator is a good idle experience. Here you can learn how a PC is made, but forget to learn how to build one seriously thanks to the game. PC Building Simulator is one of the better entries in the genre, with nice touches of authenticity and attention to detail.

It doesn't end. The game will just continuously generate random jobs.

Critic Reviews. Construction Simulator is an ultra-realistic sim title.

Should I play PC Building Simulator

It can really only be recommended if you are a die hard PC enthusiast who doesn't have a PC. The title is all in all well structured but there are obvious problems that affect the gameplay. The lack of realism in certain actions often lead to abandon the game or continue with little desire.Updated the Water-cooled RTX 2070 FTW3 Ultra Gaming GPU to use the correct number of PCI slots when installed. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 GPU can now be installed inside the iCUE 220T RGB Airflow case.Try PC Building Simulator 2 for free now, and play the first 5 levels of Career Mode.

It doesn't end. The game will just continuously generate random jobs.

How long to beat PC Building Simulator : When focusing on the main objectives, PC Building Simulator is about 23 Hours in length. If you're a gamer that strives to see all aspects of the game, you are likely to spend around 86½ Hours to obtain 100% completion.

Is PC Building Simulator 2 worth it : Tuning has improved, and so has the design of your computer store. Overall, PC Building Simulator 2 is a very well-rounded and expanded game compared to the first one. This game is jam packed filled with content and is a terrific sim if you're keen on those types of games.

What is the highest level in PC Building Simulator

The current max level is: Level 33, with experience bar full.

Unity

PC Building Simulator
Developer(s) Claudiu Kiss The Irregular Corporation
Publisher(s) The Irregular Corporation
Engine Unity
Platform(s) Windows, PlayStation 4, Xbox One, Nintendo Switch

Yep, at 1080p (lower resolution) the CPU is the likely bottleneck. At 4K (higher resolution) the bottleneck shifts to the other side. This largely depends on the game and its settings too. Lighter games compared to demanding AAA titles will vary drastically.

Is RTX 4090 power hungry : The Nvidia RTX 4090 has an official power draw of 450W, though momentary spikes of power, known as transients, may mean that it will draw more on occasion. Nvidia set the TDP of its RTX 4000 graphics cards as more of a maximum power draw, rather than a power target, so these should be less common with this generation.