To start with, Napoleon did not attack Moscow. He did attack the Russian army near the village of Borodino. He pretended that this battle was “under the walls of Moscow” but in reality, the old Russian capital was still more than 100 km away (not that it is a big distance in Russia, of course).Although the French ultimately captured Moscow, they could not hold the city in the face of a looming winter. Between the invasion and subsequent retreat, the French suffered 500,000 casualties, including 300,000 killed; the overwhelming majority of these losses were due to disease or weather.two thirds
As soon as Napoleon and his Grand Army entered Moscow, on 14 September 1812, the capital erupted in flames that eventually engulfed and destroyed two thirds of the city.
Why did Alexander burn Moscow : The September 14, 1812, torching of their own city was directed by Tsar Alexander I (1777–1825), who wished to prevent Napoleon Bonaparte (1769–1821) and his invading armies from reaping the benefits of anything Russian. Through a series of wars, Napoleon had dominated most of Europe by 1805.
Why did Napoleon stay in Moscow for so long
The circle surrounding him spoke of Napoleon's initial determination to stay in Moscow for the winter months, not because of its military value, but because of the political blow that would be dealt him should he leave; this would look like an admission of defeat, and could harm his standing in Europe.
What was Napoleon’s height : five foot two
Napoleon was often described as being short in stature. In actual fact, the height of five foot two recorded on his death was in French units, which were equivalent in today's measurement to five foot, six and a half inches or 169 centimetres – an average height.
Several critical factors, most significantly the insufficient access to resources, unfamiliar, freezing terrain, and the strategic efforts of the French military leaders, influenced the defeat of Napoleon by the Russians in 1812. At the time of his death, the French might have recorded his height in French inches, which were a little longer than English inches. They put him at five-foot-two, but this was probably more like 5 feet and 6.5 inches, a perfectly normal height for a man of his time.
What if Napoleon conquered Russia
“Had Napoleon beaten the Russians,” concludes Professor Broers, “there wouldn't have really been much trouble left inside Europe to threaten him. A unified Germany would have been impossible as long as France was strong. Poland would have been united and strong, and never conquered again.In the mid-16th century Ivan IV (the Terrible) conquered the Mongol khanates of Kazan (1552) and Astrakhan (1556), but in 1571 the Crimean Tatars captured Moscow, burning everything but the Kremlin. The annals record that only 30,000 of 200,000 inhabitants survived.First there was the political factor. Napoleon knew he could not stay in Russia forever. The longer he stayed away from Paris, the bigger the risk became that someone would try to overthrow him. Secondly, Moscow was burned to the ground. Napoleon was charmed by Alexander, describing him as "especially handsome, like a hero with all the graces of an amiable Parisian." The Tsar, in turn, seemed in awe of Napoleon and his sheer power. As they said goodbye, Napoleon was convinced he had turned the Tsar into a friend and ally.
Why did Tsar Alexander betray Napoleon : He realised that in Napoleon sentiment never got the better of reason, that as a matter of fact he had never intended his proposed "grand enterprise" seriously, and had only used it to preoccupy the mind of the Tsar while he consolidated his own power in Central Europe.
What was the average height in the 1700s : roughly 65.75 inches
The longest bone in the body, the femur comprises about a quarter of a person's height. According to Steckel's analysis, heights decreased from an average of 68.27 inches (173.4 centimeters) in the early Middle Ages to an average low of roughly 65.75 inches (167 cm) during the 17th and 18th centuries.
What did Napoleon actually look like
Napoleon was 5 feet 6 inches tall, average height at the time. In his early years he was quite lean and only after 1806 did he become heavy. In his younger years he was often described as sickly in appearance, his skin having a yellowish pallor. He had fine white teeth, which he was proud. In any event, the average height of a Frenchman in the late 18th century was 162 cm (5ft 4 inches). In 1820 it was 164cm. So the answer to the question is an emphatic no, average height would have had to reduce to 4ft 9 inches!Assuming the encounter would result in an immediate French victory, Napoleon marched his armies into Russian territories only to be met with fierce, unexpected retreats and repeated counterattacks by the Russian Imperial Army that led to a decisive Russian victory.
Would Wellington have won without Blucher : Even so, if the Prussian Army under Blücher had not arrived in the afternoon of the battle, it is highly probable that Wellington´s force would have been swept away. In total, the allied armies were 210 890 men, of which 73% were either Prussian or German.
![Kladsko-5-malý-Karlův-Most[1]](https://www.einarstrayorchestra.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Kladsko-5-maly-Karluv-Most1-1024x692-250x120.jpg)
![Stubai[1]](https://www.einarstrayorchestra.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Stubai1-250x120.jpg)
Antwort Could Napoleon have stayed in Moscow? Weitere Antworten – How close did Napoleon get to Moscow
To start with, Napoleon did not attack Moscow. He did attack the Russian army near the village of Borodino. He pretended that this battle was “under the walls of Moscow” but in reality, the old Russian capital was still more than 100 km away (not that it is a big distance in Russia, of course).Although the French ultimately captured Moscow, they could not hold the city in the face of a looming winter. Between the invasion and subsequent retreat, the French suffered 500,000 casualties, including 300,000 killed; the overwhelming majority of these losses were due to disease or weather.two thirds
As soon as Napoleon and his Grand Army entered Moscow, on 14 September 1812, the capital erupted in flames that eventually engulfed and destroyed two thirds of the city.
Why did Alexander burn Moscow : The September 14, 1812, torching of their own city was directed by Tsar Alexander I (1777–1825), who wished to prevent Napoleon Bonaparte (1769–1821) and his invading armies from reaping the benefits of anything Russian. Through a series of wars, Napoleon had dominated most of Europe by 1805.
Why did Napoleon stay in Moscow for so long
The circle surrounding him spoke of Napoleon's initial determination to stay in Moscow for the winter months, not because of its military value, but because of the political blow that would be dealt him should he leave; this would look like an admission of defeat, and could harm his standing in Europe.
What was Napoleon’s height : five foot two
Napoleon was often described as being short in stature. In actual fact, the height of five foot two recorded on his death was in French units, which were equivalent in today's measurement to five foot, six and a half inches or 169 centimetres – an average height.
Several critical factors, most significantly the insufficient access to resources, unfamiliar, freezing terrain, and the strategic efforts of the French military leaders, influenced the defeat of Napoleon by the Russians in 1812.
At the time of his death, the French might have recorded his height in French inches, which were a little longer than English inches. They put him at five-foot-two, but this was probably more like 5 feet and 6.5 inches, a perfectly normal height for a man of his time.
What if Napoleon conquered Russia
“Had Napoleon beaten the Russians,” concludes Professor Broers, “there wouldn't have really been much trouble left inside Europe to threaten him. A unified Germany would have been impossible as long as France was strong. Poland would have been united and strong, and never conquered again.In the mid-16th century Ivan IV (the Terrible) conquered the Mongol khanates of Kazan (1552) and Astrakhan (1556), but in 1571 the Crimean Tatars captured Moscow, burning everything but the Kremlin. The annals record that only 30,000 of 200,000 inhabitants survived.First there was the political factor. Napoleon knew he could not stay in Russia forever. The longer he stayed away from Paris, the bigger the risk became that someone would try to overthrow him. Secondly, Moscow was burned to the ground.
Napoleon was charmed by Alexander, describing him as "especially handsome, like a hero with all the graces of an amiable Parisian." The Tsar, in turn, seemed in awe of Napoleon and his sheer power. As they said goodbye, Napoleon was convinced he had turned the Tsar into a friend and ally.
Why did Tsar Alexander betray Napoleon : He realised that in Napoleon sentiment never got the better of reason, that as a matter of fact he had never intended his proposed "grand enterprise" seriously, and had only used it to preoccupy the mind of the Tsar while he consolidated his own power in Central Europe.
What was the average height in the 1700s : roughly 65.75 inches
The longest bone in the body, the femur comprises about a quarter of a person's height. According to Steckel's analysis, heights decreased from an average of 68.27 inches (173.4 centimeters) in the early Middle Ages to an average low of roughly 65.75 inches (167 cm) during the 17th and 18th centuries.
What did Napoleon actually look like
Napoleon was 5 feet 6 inches tall, average height at the time. In his early years he was quite lean and only after 1806 did he become heavy. In his younger years he was often described as sickly in appearance, his skin having a yellowish pallor. He had fine white teeth, which he was proud.
In any event, the average height of a Frenchman in the late 18th century was 162 cm (5ft 4 inches). In 1820 it was 164cm. So the answer to the question is an emphatic no, average height would have had to reduce to 4ft 9 inches!Assuming the encounter would result in an immediate French victory, Napoleon marched his armies into Russian territories only to be met with fierce, unexpected retreats and repeated counterattacks by the Russian Imperial Army that led to a decisive Russian victory.
Would Wellington have won without Blucher : Even so, if the Prussian Army under Blücher had not arrived in the afternoon of the battle, it is highly probable that Wellington´s force would have been swept away. In total, the allied armies were 210 890 men, of which 73% were either Prussian or German.