The Witcher 2 introduced more critical aspects of the universe, including other witcher schools, monarchs, and military leaders connected with world-changing conflicts. While The Witcher 2 is a definite improvement over the previous games, it's still unnecessary to play to enjoy The Witcher 3.So in other words, storywise it doesn't make any difference which games you do or don't play before Witcher 3, because Witcher 3's story will still be a mess in every & any case. I never played Witcher 1 & 2 and didn't feel like Witcher 3's story is a mess. And obviously hundreds of thousands of people didn't.You can skip The Witcher 1 and 2
The Witcher 1 and 2 aren't necessary in the slightest. This isn't to say they're not good games, but in order to start anew with its own canon separate from the books, CD Projekt Red gave Geralt amnesia at the beginning of the first game.
Do I need to have played The Witcher to play The Witcher 3 : Do you need to play the first two Witcher games to enjoy Witcher 3 No, but does does help fill in certain gaps relating to the main story and side quests.
Is witcher 2 or 3 better
On the other hand, The Witcher 3 is a fair bit more permissive, with combat being smoother and faster, fitting in better with the open-world, free-roam structure. Geralt is also more resilient and quick healing with potions is more of an option than it was in TW2, which required you to drink all potions ahead of time.
Is Witcher 3 connected to witcher 2 : The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt takes place around half a year after the events of The Witcher 2: Assassins of Kings, but a lot of action occurs in this short interim.
Skipping to it (Assuming you're not done the witcher 1) wont be that bad, youll get the references to the game that they throw off during the begining of the witcher 2 which will be good. Yes, you can. But I don't recommend you to because you won't understand a lot of stuff in this game if you haven't played previous titles yet.. I would recommend you to watch some videos at least, so you'll start playing The WItcher 3 with all (or almost) information that you need.
Is Witcher 2 or 3 better
On the other hand, The Witcher 3 is a fair bit more permissive, with combat being smoother and faster, fitting in better with the open-world, free-roam structure. Geralt is also more resilient and quick healing with potions is more of an option than it was in TW2, which required you to drink all potions ahead of time.The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt takes place around half a year after the events of The Witcher 2: Assassins of Kings, but a lot of action occurs in this short interim.about 51½ Hours
Its quarry: humans. How long is The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt When focusing on the main objectives, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is about 51½ Hours in length. If you're a gamer that strives to see all aspects of the game, you are likely to spend around 173 Hours to obtain 100% completion. While Witcher 3 is undeniably a modern classic, it's fairly easy to get through the entire story without using many skills beyond Geralt's two swords, so long as players are generally skilled at the combat.
Is The Witcher 2 worth it : It's without a doubt one of the best story-driven RPG out there, if not the best. And that's coming from someone who has played RPGs since the 80's. OP, I disliked the first Witcher, but the second one is really better, I loved it, and the controls have changed immensely.
Is The Witcher 2 hard : The combat is tough when you're just starting out. You must get the Position skill in the swordsmanship tree ASAP. Otherwise attacks from behind will deal 200% damage which will kill you very quickly. Be sure to use Quen to minimize damage you take.
Why Witcher 2 is better than 3
By being more linear, The Witcher 2 feels more focused and to the point, having quests and side quests that don't deviate too much from the base plot. This contrasts the main questline of the third game, where you have to run back and forth with little advancement. It is definitely shorter… Witcher 1 took me about 50 hours. This one took about 35-40… I tried to explore everything so you could run through it faster if you so desired.You can. Other than missing a few references like the story about the Order of the Flaming Rose, Alvin, love arc between Geralt/Shani or Geralt/Triss, who the Scoia'tael are or the quest to assemble Raven Armor, you won't really miss anything significant.
Is The Witcher 2 as good as 3 : Thanks to the scale, The Witcher 3 is much better at letting you just be in the world and explore, although the pacing of the plot can suffer due to the freedom of exploration. Neither game has a ton to do other than talk, kill, and loot, but the minigames are a worthwhile distraction.
![Kladsko-5-malý-Karlův-Most[1]](https://www.einarstrayorchestra.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Kladsko-5-maly-Karluv-Most1-1024x692-250x120.jpg)
![Stubai[1]](https://www.einarstrayorchestra.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Stubai1-250x120.jpg)
Antwort Can you play Witcher 3 without Witcher 2? Weitere Antworten – Do I need to play Witcher 2 before 3
The Witcher 2 introduced more critical aspects of the universe, including other witcher schools, monarchs, and military leaders connected with world-changing conflicts. While The Witcher 2 is a definite improvement over the previous games, it's still unnecessary to play to enjoy The Witcher 3.So in other words, storywise it doesn't make any difference which games you do or don't play before Witcher 3, because Witcher 3's story will still be a mess in every & any case. I never played Witcher 1 & 2 and didn't feel like Witcher 3's story is a mess. And obviously hundreds of thousands of people didn't.You can skip The Witcher 1 and 2
The Witcher 1 and 2 aren't necessary in the slightest. This isn't to say they're not good games, but in order to start anew with its own canon separate from the books, CD Projekt Red gave Geralt amnesia at the beginning of the first game.
Do I need to have played The Witcher to play The Witcher 3 : Do you need to play the first two Witcher games to enjoy Witcher 3 No, but does does help fill in certain gaps relating to the main story and side quests.
Is witcher 2 or 3 better
On the other hand, The Witcher 3 is a fair bit more permissive, with combat being smoother and faster, fitting in better with the open-world, free-roam structure. Geralt is also more resilient and quick healing with potions is more of an option than it was in TW2, which required you to drink all potions ahead of time.
Is Witcher 3 connected to witcher 2 : The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt takes place around half a year after the events of The Witcher 2: Assassins of Kings, but a lot of action occurs in this short interim.
Skipping to it (Assuming you're not done the witcher 1) wont be that bad, youll get the references to the game that they throw off during the begining of the witcher 2 which will be good.
Yes, you can. But I don't recommend you to because you won't understand a lot of stuff in this game if you haven't played previous titles yet.. I would recommend you to watch some videos at least, so you'll start playing The WItcher 3 with all (or almost) information that you need.
Is Witcher 2 or 3 better
On the other hand, The Witcher 3 is a fair bit more permissive, with combat being smoother and faster, fitting in better with the open-world, free-roam structure. Geralt is also more resilient and quick healing with potions is more of an option than it was in TW2, which required you to drink all potions ahead of time.The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt takes place around half a year after the events of The Witcher 2: Assassins of Kings, but a lot of action occurs in this short interim.about 51½ Hours
Its quarry: humans. How long is The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt When focusing on the main objectives, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is about 51½ Hours in length. If you're a gamer that strives to see all aspects of the game, you are likely to spend around 173 Hours to obtain 100% completion.
While Witcher 3 is undeniably a modern classic, it's fairly easy to get through the entire story without using many skills beyond Geralt's two swords, so long as players are generally skilled at the combat.
Is The Witcher 2 worth it : It's without a doubt one of the best story-driven RPG out there, if not the best. And that's coming from someone who has played RPGs since the 80's. OP, I disliked the first Witcher, but the second one is really better, I loved it, and the controls have changed immensely.
Is The Witcher 2 hard : The combat is tough when you're just starting out. You must get the Position skill in the swordsmanship tree ASAP. Otherwise attacks from behind will deal 200% damage which will kill you very quickly. Be sure to use Quen to minimize damage you take.
Why Witcher 2 is better than 3
By being more linear, The Witcher 2 feels more focused and to the point, having quests and side quests that don't deviate too much from the base plot. This contrasts the main questline of the third game, where you have to run back and forth with little advancement.
It is definitely shorter… Witcher 1 took me about 50 hours. This one took about 35-40… I tried to explore everything so you could run through it faster if you so desired.You can. Other than missing a few references like the story about the Order of the Flaming Rose, Alvin, love arc between Geralt/Shani or Geralt/Triss, who the Scoia'tael are or the quest to assemble Raven Armor, you won't really miss anything significant.
Is The Witcher 2 as good as 3 : Thanks to the scale, The Witcher 3 is much better at letting you just be in the world and explore, although the pacing of the plot can suffer due to the freedom of exploration. Neither game has a ton to do other than talk, kill, and loot, but the minigames are a worthwhile distraction.