While The Witcher 2 is a definite improvement over the previous games, it's still unnecessary to play to enjoy The Witcher 3. CDPR even expected this, as a mechanic in place allows players who started on The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt to determine Geralt's choices throughout the second game.So in other words, storywise it doesn't make any difference which games you do or don't play before Witcher 3, because Witcher 3's story will still be a mess in every & any case. I never played Witcher 1 & 2 and didn't feel like Witcher 3's story is a mess. And obviously hundreds of thousands of people didn't.You won't miss much if you start from Witcher 3. There's a few characters that have side quests that you'll be confused on, but it's not that big of a deal. All of the important plot from Witcher 2 is given to you at the beginning of Witcher 3. Witcher 3 is better looking, much longer, and a bit more casual friendly.
Do I need to know the story to play Witcher 3 : While it's absolutely recommended that you do (and maybe read the books) to gain a completely new perspective on the game (and The Witcher series in general), CD Projekt Red has done a very well done job in making sure that you can jump in to the game without any prior knowledge of it.
Can I skip Witcher 1 and play witcher 2
Skipping to it (Assuming you're not done the witcher 1) wont be that bad, youll get the references to the game that they throw off during the begining of the witcher 2 which will be good.
Is witcher 2 or 3 better : On the other hand, The Witcher 3 is a fair bit more permissive, with combat being smoother and faster, fitting in better with the open-world, free-roam structure. Geralt is also more resilient and quick healing with potions is more of an option than it was in TW2, which required you to drink all potions ahead of time.
Players can rest easy as The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt requires no knowledge of prior titles. Despite being the third entry in the series, The Witcher 3 does not, in fact, require players to have completed its predecessors.
Skipping to it (Assuming you're not done the witcher 1) wont be that bad, youll get the references to the game that they throw off during the begining of the witcher 2 which will be good.
Are Witcher 1 and 2 worth it
OP, I disliked the first Witcher, but the second one is really better, I loved it, and the controls have changed immensely. You may or may not like it, but don't let the first Witcher's controls throw you off, they're not there anymore. It feels more like a Mass Effect with swords now, gameplay-wise.On the other hand, The Witcher 3 is a fair bit more permissive, with combat being smoother and faster, fitting in better with the open-world, free-roam structure. Geralt is also more resilient and quick healing with potions is more of an option than it was in TW2, which required you to drink all potions ahead of time.The first 2 (AND the books) help you learn about the character and the back story. They aren't required to play and understand the game, but they make the experience so much better.
The Witcher 3 for example, takes six months after the events of The Witcher 2 ended. During that time, tons of crazy things have happened that drastically changed the state of the game world. That's why it's understandable why players get disoriented or bewildered even if they came from the 2nd game.
Is Witcher 2 connected to Witcher 3 : Witcher 2 choices affect Witcher 3's story in terms of the development of Geralt and the world around him as he rebuilds his former life. With the help of the sorceress Síle de Tancarville, Geralt recovers his memories regarding Yennefer of Vengerberg, a powerful sorceress and his lover from the books and series.
Is The Witcher 2 necessary : You definitely don't need to. The Witcher 3 does a good job of explaining things. Although in the Witcher 2 you'll see what happened earlier to some of the characters who will appear in The Witcher 3 such as Roche and Phillipa.
Is Witcher 3 long to beat
about 56 Hours
When focusing on the main objectives, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt – Game of the Year Edition is about 56 Hours in length. If you're a gamer that strives to see all aspects of the game, you are likely to spend around 189 Hours to obtain 100% completion.
Long answer: Witcher 3 works on a pretty much standalone way, like, I also played just the W3, not even the books, games or series.The Witcher 3 tips: the essential guide for beginners
Quicksave before every fight.
Meditate for an hour to fully recover your health.
Prepare for tough fights with oils and potions.
Learn when to dodge, when to roll, and when to parry.
Head to all the notice boards when in a new region.
Is it necessary to play Witcher 1 before 2 : The witcher game series handles much like the books. each game is it's own story, but each game has events and characters that relate through other games or books. because of this, you do not have to play one game to understand something in another. although it may make a little more sense.
![Kladsko-5-malý-Karlův-Most[1]](https://www.einarstrayorchestra.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Kladsko-5-maly-Karluv-Most1-1024x692-250x120.jpg)
![Stubai[1]](https://www.einarstrayorchestra.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Stubai1-250x120.jpg)
Antwort Can I play Witcher 3 without playing 1 and 2? Weitere Antworten – Do you have to play Witcher 1 and 2 to play 3
While The Witcher 2 is a definite improvement over the previous games, it's still unnecessary to play to enjoy The Witcher 3. CDPR even expected this, as a mechanic in place allows players who started on The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt to determine Geralt's choices throughout the second game.So in other words, storywise it doesn't make any difference which games you do or don't play before Witcher 3, because Witcher 3's story will still be a mess in every & any case. I never played Witcher 1 & 2 and didn't feel like Witcher 3's story is a mess. And obviously hundreds of thousands of people didn't.You won't miss much if you start from Witcher 3. There's a few characters that have side quests that you'll be confused on, but it's not that big of a deal. All of the important plot from Witcher 2 is given to you at the beginning of Witcher 3. Witcher 3 is better looking, much longer, and a bit more casual friendly.
Do I need to know the story to play Witcher 3 : While it's absolutely recommended that you do (and maybe read the books) to gain a completely new perspective on the game (and The Witcher series in general), CD Projekt Red has done a very well done job in making sure that you can jump in to the game without any prior knowledge of it.
Can I skip Witcher 1 and play witcher 2
Skipping to it (Assuming you're not done the witcher 1) wont be that bad, youll get the references to the game that they throw off during the begining of the witcher 2 which will be good.
Is witcher 2 or 3 better : On the other hand, The Witcher 3 is a fair bit more permissive, with combat being smoother and faster, fitting in better with the open-world, free-roam structure. Geralt is also more resilient and quick healing with potions is more of an option than it was in TW2, which required you to drink all potions ahead of time.
Players can rest easy as The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt requires no knowledge of prior titles. Despite being the third entry in the series, The Witcher 3 does not, in fact, require players to have completed its predecessors.
Skipping to it (Assuming you're not done the witcher 1) wont be that bad, youll get the references to the game that they throw off during the begining of the witcher 2 which will be good.
Are Witcher 1 and 2 worth it
OP, I disliked the first Witcher, but the second one is really better, I loved it, and the controls have changed immensely. You may or may not like it, but don't let the first Witcher's controls throw you off, they're not there anymore. It feels more like a Mass Effect with swords now, gameplay-wise.On the other hand, The Witcher 3 is a fair bit more permissive, with combat being smoother and faster, fitting in better with the open-world, free-roam structure. Geralt is also more resilient and quick healing with potions is more of an option than it was in TW2, which required you to drink all potions ahead of time.The first 2 (AND the books) help you learn about the character and the back story. They aren't required to play and understand the game, but they make the experience so much better.
The Witcher 3 for example, takes six months after the events of The Witcher 2 ended. During that time, tons of crazy things have happened that drastically changed the state of the game world. That's why it's understandable why players get disoriented or bewildered even if they came from the 2nd game.
Is Witcher 2 connected to Witcher 3 : Witcher 2 choices affect Witcher 3's story in terms of the development of Geralt and the world around him as he rebuilds his former life. With the help of the sorceress Síle de Tancarville, Geralt recovers his memories regarding Yennefer of Vengerberg, a powerful sorceress and his lover from the books and series.
Is The Witcher 2 necessary : You definitely don't need to. The Witcher 3 does a good job of explaining things. Although in the Witcher 2 you'll see what happened earlier to some of the characters who will appear in The Witcher 3 such as Roche and Phillipa.
Is Witcher 3 long to beat
about 56 Hours
When focusing on the main objectives, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt – Game of the Year Edition is about 56 Hours in length. If you're a gamer that strives to see all aspects of the game, you are likely to spend around 189 Hours to obtain 100% completion.
Long answer: Witcher 3 works on a pretty much standalone way, like, I also played just the W3, not even the books, games or series.The Witcher 3 tips: the essential guide for beginners
Is it necessary to play Witcher 1 before 2 : The witcher game series handles much like the books. each game is it's own story, but each game has events and characters that relate through other games or books. because of this, you do not have to play one game to understand something in another. although it may make a little more sense.