A T-34 facing up against a Heavy Tank the Tiger II the tiger wins automatically there is no possible way a T34 can penetrate it's 184mm turret armor and a sloped frontal armor of the heavy. The Soviet T34 didn't do so well against less powerful Tiger I and Panther tanks.84,070 T-34s
Altogether, as many as 84,070 T-34s are thought to have been built, plus 13,170 self-propelled guns built on T-34 chassis. It was the most-produced tank of the Second World War, and the second most-produced tank of all time, after its successor, the T-54/55 series.They were highly effective at destroying enemy Tigers. The Soviets also developed the 85 mm anti-tank gun, which was mounted on the ferociously mass-produced T-34s to form the T-34-85. Later came the SU-85, which could effectively knock out Tigers from a greater distance.
Is the T-34 better than the Tiger 2 : The Tiger II (H) has almost double the fire rate and good APHE. The T34 boasts a stronger turret and is slightly more mobile but the hull is overall weaker and the reload takes a long time.
Why was the T-34 bad
(8) In summary, the T-34/76's inherent fire control efficiency was so bad that even well trained and experienced tank crews were put at a severe disadvantage. For inexperienced tank crews, with no radios and probably no organised combined arms support, it was a disaster.
Is the T-34 100 real : The Konštrukta T-34/100 is a Czechoslovakian tier 7 medium tank. Development project of the Soviet T-34-85 tank, proposed in April 1954. The Czechoslovakian variant of the vehicle was to receive a 100 mm gun and an enlarged turret. Production was planned to start in 1955; however, the work never started.
The T-34/76's one great weakness was its fire control efficiency. It suffered from the same two-man turret syndrome as other Soviet tanks in this period, namely that the tank's commander, gun aimer, gun firer and platoon commander (if a platoon leader), were all the same person. Churchill tanks
One Tiger was hit by three shots from the 6-pounder guns (57mm) of the Churchill tanks of A Squadron, 4 Troop of the 48th Royal Tank Regiment (48 RTR).
What is the weakness of the T-34
The T-34/76's one great weakness was its fire control efficiency. It suffered from the same two-man turret syndrome as other Soviet tanks in this period, namely that the tank's commander, gun aimer, gun firer and platoon commander (if a platoon leader), were all the same person.Prior to the invasion of the Soviet Union during World War II, the German armed forces were not aware of two newly developed Soviet tanks, the T-34 and the KV. As a result, they were surprised when they met them in combat for the first time in June 1941.The T-34 is discussed here as a case history. (8) In summary, the T-34/76's inherent fire control efficiency was so bad that even well trained and experienced tank crews were put at a severe disadvantage. For inexperienced tank crews, with no radios and probably no organised combined arms support, it was a disaster. T-34-57 – A very small number of T-34s were fitted with the ZiS-4 L/73 high-velocity 57 mm gun in 1941 and 1943 to be used as tank destroyers.
Could a T-34 destroy a tiger : They were highly effective at destroying enemy Tigers. The Soviets also developed the 85 mm anti-tank gun, which was mounted on the ferociously mass-produced T-34s to form the T-34-85. Later came the SU-85, which could effectively knock out Tigers from a greater distance.
Could a t34 destroy a Tiger : They were highly effective at destroying enemy Tigers. The Soviets also developed the 85 mm anti-tank gun, which was mounted on the ferociously mass-produced T-34s to form the T-34-85. Later came the SU-85, which could effectively knock out Tigers from a greater distance.
Was the Tiger 1 a bad tank
1,347 were built between August 1942 and August 1944. After August 1944, production of the Tiger I was phased out in favour of the Tiger II. While the Tiger I has been called an outstanding design for its time, it has also been called overengineered, using expensive materials and labour-intensive production methods. German tank guns proved to be somewhat ineffective at greater range and within the lethality envelope of the F-34 tank gun used by the T-34 and KV-1. Generally, the T-34 outclassed the existing Panzer III and short-barreled Panzer IV medium tanks.The T-34/76 was dominant in the early stages of the Second World War and came as a nasty surprise to the Germans in 1941. The T-34/76 was a Russian medium tank which first saw service in 1940. It had a truly long lasting impact on the battlefield, with an impressive balance of firepower, armour protection and mobility.
Is the T-34 bad : Exacerbating this was the fact that the T-34/76 had relatively poor main gun optics quality, no turret basket, a very cramped and low turret (the gun could not depress more than three degrees severely restricting use on a reverse slope or at close range), poor turret drive reliability, no radios, and generally poor …
![Kladsko-5-malý-Karlův-Most[1]](https://www.einarstrayorchestra.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Kladsko-5-maly-Karluv-Most1-1024x692-250x120.jpg)
![Stubai[1]](https://www.einarstrayorchestra.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Stubai1-250x120.jpg)
Antwort Can a t34 destroy a Tiger? Weitere Antworten – Who would win T34 vs Tiger
A T-34 facing up against a Heavy Tank the Tiger II the tiger wins automatically there is no possible way a T34 can penetrate it's 184mm turret armor and a sloped frontal armor of the heavy. The Soviet T34 didn't do so well against less powerful Tiger I and Panther tanks.84,070 T-34s
Altogether, as many as 84,070 T-34s are thought to have been built, plus 13,170 self-propelled guns built on T-34 chassis. It was the most-produced tank of the Second World War, and the second most-produced tank of all time, after its successor, the T-54/55 series.They were highly effective at destroying enemy Tigers. The Soviets also developed the 85 mm anti-tank gun, which was mounted on the ferociously mass-produced T-34s to form the T-34-85. Later came the SU-85, which could effectively knock out Tigers from a greater distance.
Is the T-34 better than the Tiger 2 : The Tiger II (H) has almost double the fire rate and good APHE. The T34 boasts a stronger turret and is slightly more mobile but the hull is overall weaker and the reload takes a long time.
Why was the T-34 bad
(8) In summary, the T-34/76's inherent fire control efficiency was so bad that even well trained and experienced tank crews were put at a severe disadvantage. For inexperienced tank crews, with no radios and probably no organised combined arms support, it was a disaster.
Is the T-34 100 real : The Konštrukta T-34/100 is a Czechoslovakian tier 7 medium tank. Development project of the Soviet T-34-85 tank, proposed in April 1954. The Czechoslovakian variant of the vehicle was to receive a 100 mm gun and an enlarged turret. Production was planned to start in 1955; however, the work never started.
The T-34/76's one great weakness was its fire control efficiency. It suffered from the same two-man turret syndrome as other Soviet tanks in this period, namely that the tank's commander, gun aimer, gun firer and platoon commander (if a platoon leader), were all the same person.
Churchill tanks
One Tiger was hit by three shots from the 6-pounder guns (57mm) of the Churchill tanks of A Squadron, 4 Troop of the 48th Royal Tank Regiment (48 RTR).
What is the weakness of the T-34
The T-34/76's one great weakness was its fire control efficiency. It suffered from the same two-man turret syndrome as other Soviet tanks in this period, namely that the tank's commander, gun aimer, gun firer and platoon commander (if a platoon leader), were all the same person.Prior to the invasion of the Soviet Union during World War II, the German armed forces were not aware of two newly developed Soviet tanks, the T-34 and the KV. As a result, they were surprised when they met them in combat for the first time in June 1941.The T-34 is discussed here as a case history. (8) In summary, the T-34/76's inherent fire control efficiency was so bad that even well trained and experienced tank crews were put at a severe disadvantage. For inexperienced tank crews, with no radios and probably no organised combined arms support, it was a disaster.
T-34-57 – A very small number of T-34s were fitted with the ZiS-4 L/73 high-velocity 57 mm gun in 1941 and 1943 to be used as tank destroyers.
Could a T-34 destroy a tiger : They were highly effective at destroying enemy Tigers. The Soviets also developed the 85 mm anti-tank gun, which was mounted on the ferociously mass-produced T-34s to form the T-34-85. Later came the SU-85, which could effectively knock out Tigers from a greater distance.
Could a t34 destroy a Tiger : They were highly effective at destroying enemy Tigers. The Soviets also developed the 85 mm anti-tank gun, which was mounted on the ferociously mass-produced T-34s to form the T-34-85. Later came the SU-85, which could effectively knock out Tigers from a greater distance.
Was the Tiger 1 a bad tank
1,347 were built between August 1942 and August 1944. After August 1944, production of the Tiger I was phased out in favour of the Tiger II. While the Tiger I has been called an outstanding design for its time, it has also been called overengineered, using expensive materials and labour-intensive production methods.
German tank guns proved to be somewhat ineffective at greater range and within the lethality envelope of the F-34 tank gun used by the T-34 and KV-1. Generally, the T-34 outclassed the existing Panzer III and short-barreled Panzer IV medium tanks.The T-34/76 was dominant in the early stages of the Second World War and came as a nasty surprise to the Germans in 1941. The T-34/76 was a Russian medium tank which first saw service in 1940. It had a truly long lasting impact on the battlefield, with an impressive balance of firepower, armour protection and mobility.
Is the T-34 bad : Exacerbating this was the fact that the T-34/76 had relatively poor main gun optics quality, no turret basket, a very cramped and low turret (the gun could not depress more than three degrees severely restricting use on a reverse slope or at close range), poor turret drive reliability, no radios, and generally poor …