In modern times, firearms have largely supplanted bows and crossbows as weapons of war, but crossbows remain widely used for competitive shooting sports and hunting, and for relatively silent shooting.They were important weapons of war from ancient history until the early modern period, where they were rendered increasingly obsolete by the development of the more powerful and accurate firearms. Today, bows and arrows are mostly used for hunting and sports.It is documented as part of warfare and hunting from the classical period (where it figures in the mythologies of many cultures) until the end of the 19th century, when it was made obsolete by the invention and spread of repeating firearms. Longbowmen archers of the Middle Ages.
Did they use bows and arrows in WWII : Famously, 'Mad' Jack Churchill (no relation) took his longbow and arrows with him to France, and used bagpipes and claymore in Norway. He considered an officer improperly dressed that was not wearing his sword. Originally Answered: Were archers ever used in WWII Of course!
Is archery still useful
Archery is a very fun and helpful sport for everyone. It allows everyone to get a chance to compete against other grade levels.
Why bows are better than guns : Bows are easier and cheaper to produce than firearms. Bows like the English longbow are more accurate over greater distances than a musket in the hands of a well-trained archer.
Penetration increases with the projectile's speed and weight. Bullets travel faster than arrows, but arrows are heavier than bullets. Nevertheless, if you calculate the momentum and kinetic energy of arrows, even the most potent bow seems much less lethal than a firearm. The last time bows were used in battle against an organized military force was possibly 1886. That's when the U.S. cavalry finally captured the Chiricahua Apache known as Geronimo. He and his band of renegade Apache warriors were still using bows when fighting U.S. troops on the Western frontier.
Did the US military ever use bows
Recon Team Pick of Military Assistance Command, Vietnam-Studies and Observations Group, pictured shortly after the prisoner snatch mission in which Staff Sgt. Robert Graham, far left, used a bow and arrows in combat.His regiment was part of the Expeditionary Force to France. Churchill used his bow and arrows while on patrol, knowing that the bow was an extraordinarily effective weapon in skilled hands as it was silent and accurate up to 200 yards.Although the accurate range of bows is smaller than that of rifles (which can be effective up to a distance of several hundreds of meters or more), the maximal cast of powerful bows equals the effective range of some rifles. Archery is a timeless sport, which began tens of thousands of years ago. It's still a valuable skill used for hunting, protection, strength, and so much more.
Can a bow win against a gun : A bow and arrow is not an effective weapon in a gunfight. Guns, especially modern firearms, have a much greater range, accuracy, and firepower than a bow and arrow, and a person armed with a bow and arrow would be at a significant disadvantage in a firefight against someone with a gun.
Can a bow be as powerful as a gun : Penetration increases with the projectile's speed and weight. Bullets travel faster than arrows, but arrows are heavier than bullets. Nevertheless, if you calculate the momentum and kinetic energy of arrows, even the most potent bow seems much less lethal than a firearm.
Is an arrow stronger than a bullet
As long as the bullet isn't massively over penetrating, which isn't likely in the case of a 9mm round, it will do far more damage than any crude arrow fired from a crude bow would do. Bullets simply deliver far more energy than an arrow can. However, archery was so effective that it could not be ignored: if one side in a conflict numbered archers among its ranks, the other side would be at a grave disadvantage if it did not, so once the use of bow and crossbow became widespread, archers formed a constituent part of any army.The Archers" radio program on BBC Radio 4 continues to maintain a dedicated and loyal listener base, making it one of the longest-running and most iconic radio soap operas in the UK.
Why are guns better than bows : Aiming is more difficult with a bow than with a firearm as well. Unless the target is very close, the archer needs to compensate for gravity and shoot the arrow in an arc – hence the word archery. Because bullets travel much faster than arrows, a gunner can aim in a straight line, which is easier.
![Kladsko-5-malý-Karlův-Most[1]](https://www.einarstrayorchestra.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Kladsko-5-maly-Karluv-Most1-1024x692-250x120.jpg)
![Stubai[1]](https://www.einarstrayorchestra.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Stubai1-250x120.jpg)
Antwort Are bows still used in war? Weitere Antworten – Do modern soldiers use bows
In modern times, firearms have largely supplanted bows and crossbows as weapons of war, but crossbows remain widely used for competitive shooting sports and hunting, and for relatively silent shooting.They were important weapons of war from ancient history until the early modern period, where they were rendered increasingly obsolete by the development of the more powerful and accurate firearms. Today, bows and arrows are mostly used for hunting and sports.It is documented as part of warfare and hunting from the classical period (where it figures in the mythologies of many cultures) until the end of the 19th century, when it was made obsolete by the invention and spread of repeating firearms. Longbowmen archers of the Middle Ages.
Did they use bows and arrows in WWII : Famously, 'Mad' Jack Churchill (no relation) took his longbow and arrows with him to France, and used bagpipes and claymore in Norway. He considered an officer improperly dressed that was not wearing his sword. Originally Answered: Were archers ever used in WWII Of course!
Is archery still useful
Archery is a very fun and helpful sport for everyone. It allows everyone to get a chance to compete against other grade levels.
Why bows are better than guns : Bows are easier and cheaper to produce than firearms. Bows like the English longbow are more accurate over greater distances than a musket in the hands of a well-trained archer.
Penetration increases with the projectile's speed and weight. Bullets travel faster than arrows, but arrows are heavier than bullets. Nevertheless, if you calculate the momentum and kinetic energy of arrows, even the most potent bow seems much less lethal than a firearm.
The last time bows were used in battle against an organized military force was possibly 1886. That's when the U.S. cavalry finally captured the Chiricahua Apache known as Geronimo. He and his band of renegade Apache warriors were still using bows when fighting U.S. troops on the Western frontier.
Did the US military ever use bows
Recon Team Pick of Military Assistance Command, Vietnam-Studies and Observations Group, pictured shortly after the prisoner snatch mission in which Staff Sgt. Robert Graham, far left, used a bow and arrows in combat.His regiment was part of the Expeditionary Force to France. Churchill used his bow and arrows while on patrol, knowing that the bow was an extraordinarily effective weapon in skilled hands as it was silent and accurate up to 200 yards.Although the accurate range of bows is smaller than that of rifles (which can be effective up to a distance of several hundreds of meters or more), the maximal cast of powerful bows equals the effective range of some rifles.
Archery is a timeless sport, which began tens of thousands of years ago. It's still a valuable skill used for hunting, protection, strength, and so much more.
Can a bow win against a gun : A bow and arrow is not an effective weapon in a gunfight. Guns, especially modern firearms, have a much greater range, accuracy, and firepower than a bow and arrow, and a person armed with a bow and arrow would be at a significant disadvantage in a firefight against someone with a gun.
Can a bow be as powerful as a gun : Penetration increases with the projectile's speed and weight. Bullets travel faster than arrows, but arrows are heavier than bullets. Nevertheless, if you calculate the momentum and kinetic energy of arrows, even the most potent bow seems much less lethal than a firearm.
Is an arrow stronger than a bullet
As long as the bullet isn't massively over penetrating, which isn't likely in the case of a 9mm round, it will do far more damage than any crude arrow fired from a crude bow would do. Bullets simply deliver far more energy than an arrow can.
However, archery was so effective that it could not be ignored: if one side in a conflict numbered archers among its ranks, the other side would be at a grave disadvantage if it did not, so once the use of bow and crossbow became widespread, archers formed a constituent part of any army.The Archers" radio program on BBC Radio 4 continues to maintain a dedicated and loyal listener base, making it one of the longest-running and most iconic radio soap operas in the UK.
Why are guns better than bows : Aiming is more difficult with a bow than with a firearm as well. Unless the target is very close, the archer needs to compensate for gravity and shoot the arrow in an arc – hence the word archery. Because bullets travel much faster than arrows, a gunner can aim in a straight line, which is easier.